3

A woman that does not reveal her blemishes before marriage sometimes loses her kesuba (Rambam halacha 2 here, Shulchan Aruch here)

Does a man need to reveal his blemishes before marriage?

Sources please

10
  • Yes. There is a biblical obligation of vahavta lreakha kamokha.
    – mevaqesh
    Commented Nov 19, 2017 at 3:56
  • @mevaqesh I am asking if anything more then that, and maybe you are wrong see elitedaily.com/dating/979150
    – hazoriz
    Commented Nov 19, 2017 at 3:59
  • More than a biblical obligation?
    – mevaqesh
    Commented Nov 19, 2017 at 4:00
  • @mevaqesh by a woman it there seems to be an additional obligation (to the biblical) or it is questionable if she is married, is there anything similar by a man? (that is what I am asking)
    – hazoriz
    Commented Nov 19, 2017 at 4:02
  • 1
    I don't see any evidence of any obligation. I see that if you fool someone he doesn't have to suffer the consequences.
    – mevaqesh
    Commented Nov 19, 2017 at 4:08

1 Answer 1

2

Let's start by saying that every situation is different and, for any real shidduch, you will want to speak to a rav who knows the situation well.

This being said, R Yirmiyohu Kaganoff at yeshiva.co has a very nice summary of the issues. He frames it as follows:

  • Honesty (emet) requires one to be truthful in his dealings and one may not deceive someone about a shidduch by misinforming the other party - he notes however there might be allowances not to disclose everything to avoid creating disputes (machlokes), embarrassing someone or hurting a person’s feelings or reputation

  • Not misleading someone (geneivat daat) means not overselling one party in a shidduch or making false promises

  • Fraud (onaah) means one must notify the other party of information that might be of concern. He quotes Sefer Chassidim (507) that "do not hide medical issues from the other party to which they would object enough to decline the shidduch"

He also notes shidduchim are subject to some exceptions

  • One is not required to disclose a problem the other party could discover, e.g., if the scandalous activities of a family member are well known in one’s hometown, one need not tell the other party since this information could be discovered by asking around
  • Insignificant information: shidduchim do not require revealing every possible medical or yichus issue. The Chofetz Chaim distinguishes between a medical issue one must reveal and a "weakness," which one need not. Thus, someone need not reveal minor ailments that would not disturb the average person.

In most instances, there is no requirement to notify the other party or a shadchan of any of these blemishes at the time a shidduch is suggested. Many contemporary poskim contend that one should reveal this information after the couple has met a few times - about the time the relationship is beginning to get serious.

To come back to your question therefore, one has to disclose significant hidden blemishes that would be of concern to the other party once the relation gets serious.

See the original for sources and more examples.

See also a similar compilation from R Chaim Jachter with more sources and examples of blemishes to be disclosed (e.g., significant diseases, reproductive issues)

8
  • @DoubleAA see igros moshe 3- E"H 1- 79 and 80
    – hazoriz
    Commented Nov 19, 2017 at 17:21
  • I wonder nobody mentioned the simplest thing the Kiddushin is based on - Mekakh Tous (מקח טעות). The kiddushin being a voluntary process is based on personal evaluation of the acquisition. A person can annul the Kiddushin if turns out it was a Mekakh Tous. The Mishna in Kiddushin deals with many forms of misleading conditions (like "Marry me for I'm rich and he's not" or the opposite) and many of them are subsequently annulled retroactively as based on Mekakh Tous - false premises.
    – Al Berko
    Commented Nov 20, 2017 at 0:31
  • @mbloch All three listed will not annul a marriage retroactively, only Mekakh Tous.
    – Al Berko
    Commented Nov 20, 2017 at 0:33
  • @AlBerko fraud is a mekach taus and would be retroactive. Your cases are specifically if the party makes the marriage conditional upon an issue being true. Then it is retroactively nullified. It seems the OP is dealing with regular shidduchim where no one expressed a conditional clause. Commented Nov 20, 2017 at 1:16
  • @AlBerko I hear you and agree - but the question was whether you have to reveal blemishes before marriage. Not what are the cases in which you can annul a marriage retroactively
    – mbloch
    Commented Nov 20, 2017 at 12:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .