Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
In response to another question, I was told that the Talmud was considered canonical by Orthodox Jews. I have heard it called authoritative, but never canonical before. The cursory sources I checked did not include the Talmud as a part of the canon, though they clearly recognized it as authoritative as well.
This is not an answerable question. Whether something is canonical depends on your definition of canonical. Wiktionary has six adjective definitions (besides those from the fields of music and math); W3NID online and OED online each have four. (Likewise, canon has varying definitions.) Closing.
@msh210 I strongly disagree. If someone cannot answer this question, that is very sad. It's answerable because Judaism (and the Talmud itself) has a clear definition of what canonical means. The Talmud is most definitely not part of our scriptural canon. It is, however, (colloquially) canonical in the sense that we are not empowered to overrule it, and it, itself, has defined parameters as to what is considered talmudical.
I see I must concede @msh210's point. However, I still object to this on the grounds that it's a distinction in English usage, not a distinction in the Gemara.
I meant canonical as in authoritative/indisputable as a matter of law; not that it is part of the Biblical canon. That is why I wrote "places canonical value" and not something like "considers part of the canon." See this blog post for further elaboration.
Like any library, Mi Yodeya offers tons of great information, but does not offer personalized, professional advice, and does not take the place of seeking such advice from your rabbi.