6

In todays day and age where we no longer have homes with dirt floors:

  • do you still need to cover your feet when making a bracha or davening?
  • If so are socks enough?
  • does it depend on the custom of the place you live?
  • If not would that only apply to carpeted areas?
  • is there a difference between being in a private home versus a public area?
Improve this question
1
  • 11
    perhaps document as part of the question a source that feet must be covered?
    – josh waxman
    Commented Feb 22, 2012 at 12:30

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
6
+25

I only know of covering ones feet being important while praying during the amidah (whether in private in public),

"One should not pray wearing [only] his undershirt, bareheaded, or barefoot - if it is the custom of the people of that place to stand before their most respected people with shoes." M"T Hilkhoth Tephilah 5:5

But this is in the context that if one does pray with out shoes while in a place in which it is customary to not be barefooted when in the presence of esteemed people it does not invalidate their amidah (ibn 5:1). I haven't heard of it being needed for a brakha.

Improve this answer
6
  • 3
    +1 It would seem that both the US and Israel nowadays would be classified as requiring some sort of foot covering (sandal/shoe).
    – Double AA ♦
    Commented Sep 25, 2012 at 0:25
  • 1
    Yes most places in the world today i would imagine. I wonder how it would apply with socks, maybe if you are indoors in a place where one wouldn't wear shoes even if such a person was coming over (ie one own house) it would be ok to pray in socks since thats the normal foot wear in that situation? im not to sure about that.
    – Qoheleth
    Commented Sep 25, 2012 at 0:31
  • @DoubleAA, many homes have a remove-your-shoes-at-the-door policy. I'm not sure what they'd do if their "most respected people" paid a visit, however.
    – msh210 ♦
    Commented Sep 25, 2012 at 7:09
  • @msh210 Plus "of that place" might have a slightly broader definition than each person's private home.
    – Double AA ♦
    Commented Sep 28, 2012 at 3:57
  • @DoubleAA, indeed; I was thinking, though, of a (geographical) place where such a policy is common.
    – msh210 ♦
    Commented Sep 28, 2012 at 4:51
1

I believe the Chayei Adam says in places where women go barefoot that's fine, in places where they're usually covered they should be covered.

Improve this answer
2
  • Isn't that related to general tzniut not making a bracha or davening?
    – none
    Commented Feb 22, 2012 at 14:36
  • @Moshe, correct, I think I was confusing two questions here. A, I should be properly dressed (out of respect) when I daven, so what footwear is required. B, I shouldn't daven if there's an "exposed" woman nearby, what's "exposed" with regards to feet?
    – Shalom
    Commented Feb 22, 2012 at 15:27
1

I've found that a lot of this depends on the culture around a person.

My Zeidi for example, would not allow people to go around with only socks on under any circumstances. And a Bracha could never be said in slippers. I imagine this has a lot to do with his 'proper' upbringing.

R. Aviner today, will never allow a person to go barefoot, but slippers and socks are ok.

Having your feet covered is about more than just "dirt floors". It is also a sense of dirtiness of the floor (you wouldn't eat off of it), as well as issues of respect and dignity.

Improve this answer
12
  • 6
    My father z"l did not like us to go around without shoes. I felt that his dsailike was because mourners do not wear leather shoes.
    – Avrohom Yitzchok
    Commented Feb 22, 2012 at 14:27
  • 1
    @AvrohomYitzchok this was the same reason I learned - if somebody had a source, it would make a great answer.
    – yoel
    Commented Feb 22, 2012 at 15:49
  • @AvrohomYitzchok That falls under ideas of human dignity and respect. I was told because of mourners, because "people" don't walk without shoes, only animals do, because they are smelly, and a myriad of other reasons.
    – avi
    Commented Feb 22, 2012 at 17:19
  • My Zeida as well did not like us to walk in socks. It was a superstitious concern that, just like a mourner walks without shoes, so to if you walk with out shoes you may come to be a mourner. It was not a Halacha or Torah concept as I understood it.
    – RCW
    Commented Sep 23, 2012 at 22:28
  • @AvrohomYitzchok Angels don't either.
    – Double AA ♦
    Commented Mar 10, 2014 at 21:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .