-1

Following my last question "why-did-brothers-take-yossefs-dreams-seriously".

How would the development of events be different if instead of simply dreaming, Yossef was having G-d's prophecy of the same content, just like his father saw the ladder?

In other words, after seeing the sheaves G-d appears to Yosef and says "your father and mother and brothers will bow to you." And Yosef awakes.

Could he prove it was a prophecy? Would his brothers and Yaakov believe him if he said: "G-d was speaking to me" and treat him differently? Could he ask his grandfather Itzhak or his father Yaakov what to do with the prophecy?

3
  • 3
    Yaakov saw the ladder in a dream...
    – Double AA
    Commented Dec 10, 2018 at 15:47
  • Possibly a duplicate of judaism.stackexchange.com/q/11546
    – msh210
    Commented Dec 10, 2018 at 17:28
  • @msh210 Not at all, the question is not about how do we know, but how the story would be different if anything.
    – Al Berko
    Commented Dec 10, 2018 at 17:30

2 Answers 2

1

Gen 37:10 "And he told [it] to his father and to his brothers, and his father rebuked him and said to him, "What is this dream that you have dreamed? Will we come I, your mother, and your brothers to prostrate ourselves to you to the ground?"

Rashi: "Will we come: Isn’t your mother (Rachel) already dead? But he (Jacob) did not know that the matters referred to Bilhah, who had raised him (Joseph) as [if she were] his mother (Gen. Rabbah 84:11). Our Rabbis, however, derived from here that there is no dream without meaningless components (Talmud Berachos 55a/b). Jacob, however, intended to make his sons forget the whole matter, so that they would not envy him (Joseph). Therefore, he said,“Will we come, etc.” Just as it is impossible for your mother, so is the rest meaningless."

The difference between a mere dream (which can have a level of prophetic content (see Talmud Berachos and the dream section 55a etc.), and a full prophecy, is that a dream can contain elements of nonesense. Prophecy is a clear message from Hashem.

Zechariah 10:2 "...dreams speak falsely..."

Devarim 18: 21-22:

"Now if you say to yourself, "How will we know the word that the L-rd did not speak?" If the prophet speaks in the name of the L-rd, and the thing does not occur and does not come about, that is the thing the Lord did not speak. The prophet has spoken it wantonly; you shall not be afraid of him."

However, a prophecy must come to pass in order for it to be true.

So the way we prove prophecy is simply by seeing if it happens.

Rambam Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah: 9:1-2

" Any prophet who arises and tells us that G-d has sent him does not have to [prove himself by] performing wonders like those performed by Moses, our teacher, or like the wonders of Elijah or Elisha, which altered the natural order.

Rather, the sign of [the truth of his prophecy] will be the fulfillment of his prediction of future events, as [implied by Deuteronomy 18:21]: "How shall we recognize that a prophecy was not spoken by G-d?..."

Therefore, if a person whose [progress] in the service of G-d makes him worthy of prophecy arises [and claims to be a prophet] - if he does not intend to add [to] or diminish [the Torah], but rather to serve G-d through the mitzvot of the Torah - we do not tell him: "Split the sea for us, revive the dead, or the like, and then we will believe in you." Instead, we tell him, "If you are a prophet, tell us what will happen in the future." He makes his statements, and we wait to see whether [his "prophecy"] comes to fruition or not.

Should even a minute particular of his "prophecy" not materialize, he is surely a false prophet. If his entire prophecy materializes, we should consider him a true [prophet].

We should test him many times. If all of his statements prove true, he should be considered to be a true prophet, as [I Samuel 3:20] states concerning Samuel, "And all of Israel, from Dan to Beersheba, knew that Samuel had been proven to be a prophet unto G-d."

4
  • Well, thank you, but it seems you misunderstood my Q - how the story would be different. Let's say after seeing the sheaves G-d appears to Yosef and says "your father and mother and brothers will bow to you." You're saying, to prove him right we need to see the prophecy fulfill, so, meanwhile he has the status of a dreamer? So it changes nothing in the plot.
    – Al Berko
    Commented Dec 10, 2018 at 16:07
  • Based on your answer, I edited the question to emphasize the point.
    – Al Berko
    Commented Dec 10, 2018 at 17:33
  • Right. It changes nothing. The "prophecy value" in the dream was told to Yaakov and he reacted by "guarding the thing". Yosef would need to wait for the outcome to prove prophecy; or he would need to predict some things besides the dreams that would come to pass now or very soon. That would earn him recognition as a prophet, and then they would give proper credit to his dreams. Commented Dec 11, 2018 at 2:38
  • It seems the real issue is sale of Yosef, for if he was sold - it does not matter whether his dreams were taken as prophesy or not. For the other possibility, I heard from lectures of R. Sh. Kamenetzky that had Yosef not been sold, Jewish people would have been taken to Mitzraim in chains. Would this be an acceptable answer?
    – Y DJ
    Commented Jul 24 at 3:05
1

Yosef could prove that his dream was just a dream for 2 reasons. Both of these reasons are given as an explanation of a verse in Yirmiyahu 23:29 describing prophecy: Behold, My word is like fire — declares GOD — and like a hammer that shatters rock!

  1. The prophetic experience draws a person in like fire. Rashi on this verse explains: Is not My word so like fire? They (the false prophets) should not have erred to compare their dreams to say that they are prophecy, for the prophetic word, when it comes to a prophet, it comes into him with force like a burning fire, as the matter is stated (supra 20:9): “And it was in my heart like a burning fire,” and (Ezekiel 3:14): “And the hand of the Lord became strong upon me.”

  2. A prophetic statement has several interpretations as explained in Gemara Sanhedrin 34a. The Gemara discusses the ruling of Rabbi Yoḥanan: From where is this matter derived? Abaye says: As the verse states: “God has spoken once, twice I have heard this; that strength belongs to God” (Psalms 62:12). Abaye explains: One verse is stated by God and from it emerge several explanations, but one explanation does not emerge from several verses. Alternatively, the school of Rabbi Yishmael taught that the verse states: “Is not My word like as fire? says the Lord; and like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces” (Jeremiah 23:29). Just as this hammer breaks a stone into several fragments, so too, one verse is stated by God and from it emerge several explanations. (Just note the number of different commentaries we have on our Scripture!)

Yosef did not describe his experience when seeing the dream as drawing fire. He believed that his dream also had only one interpretation. Yosef could certainly ask his father and grandfather regarding prophecy, since Rashi on Bereshis 37.3 explains that Yaakov taught Yosef everything that he learned in Yeshiva of Shem and Ever. The brothers could accept words of prophecy as well. However, here's a monkey wrench. Gemara Shabbos 89b implies that, had not Yosef been sold into slavery, Jewish people would be taken to Egypt in iron chains.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .