In Mussaf on Yom Kippur, there is a practice of prostration at various points. The Ramo writes in O"C 621:4
הגה ונוהגין ליפול על פניהם כשאומרים והכהנים והעם וגם בעלינו לשבח
But, he goes on to explain, אבל ש"צ אסור לעקור ממקומו בשעת התפלה כדי לפול על פניו ויש למחות ביד העושים כן so according to his view, the Chazzan may not move in order to effect the bowing (so he starts away from the lectern, or it is moved from him).
The Mishna Berurah seemingly argues on this in 104:10 saying that walking for a need is not a hefsek, only moving without a pressing need is "halicha" which constitutes a problem (אבל שלא לצורך מקרי הליכה). However, on 621:4 the Mishna Berurah writes (about a Chazzan who moves) "ויש למחות - דהרי שנינו אפילו נחש כרוך על עקבו לא יפסיק:", referencing the mechaber in 104 even though the mechaber actually says ("ואפי' נחש כרוך על עקבו לא יפסיק אבל יכול לילך למקום אחר כדי שיפול הנחש מרגלו)".
He then reverses his course in the next entry as he describes the prevalent practice,
אבל כבר פשט המנהג שגם הש"ץ עושה כן ונראה שהם סומכין דהליכה לא מקרי הפסק
But wouldn't moving in order to do a proper bowing be l'tzorech? Is it less a tzorech than going across a room to check a halacha or to get away from talking people, which is allowed? Why would the M"B consider it a hefsek in the first place (this is, ignoring that in one place he SAYS that halicha isn't a hefsek, and then he elsewhere says that it is)?
I have seen a Chazzan "jump" away from the lectern as if hopping is less halicha (is it?) but if the proper bowing is an important part of the davening, why would walking a pace or two be a problem?