9
Please note that the following answer is not a halachik ruling and should not be read as such. It is a theoretical answer that explores the issue, examining the relevant issues.
With regard to the Gemara in Shabbat 33a, it seems clear that the context of discouraging sexual discussion is only when it is done in banter and tastelessly. When it is done for ...
7
According to Rambam, the prohibition of ona'at d'varim is specifically in a case where one intends to hurt the subject. Accordingly, in this case, if the point of the downvote is not to hurt the subject, then the prohibition would not be violated. In this vein, Rambam writes in Perush HaMishna to Bava Metsia (4:10) that onaat d'varim is insidious, for only ...
6
Rabbi Ahron Lopiansky said that discussing matters of a sexual nature in a public forum is improper. He said that if looking for a source, the Talmud in Shabbos 33a was pertinent. He never acknowledged this as a definitive source, though:
Said R. Hanan b. Rabbah: All know for what purpose a bride enters the bridal canopy, yet against whomsoever who speaks ...
4
According to an article on "Internet Privacy in Halacha" by R' Asher Meir in the Winter 2014 issue of Jewish Action, it is forbidden to publicize someone's secret identity.
R' Meir says that revealing someone else's private information violates the prohibition in Vayikra 19:16:
... לֹא תֵלֵךְ רָכִיל בְּעַמֶּיךָ
You shall not go around as a ...
4
While the question of the topics included in the mitsvah of Torah study, is surprisingly unaddressed in Hazal and Rishonim, we have a few sources that pertain to various subsets of the site.
Rambam writes in Perush Hamishna to Avot (1:16) as follows:
ואני אומר, כי הדיבור יתחלק לפי חיוב תורתנו לחמשה חלקים: מצווה, ואסור, ומאוס, ואהוב, ומותר...החלק הראשון, ...
3
I recognize the irony in answering a halachic question on MY about how careful one should be when answering halachic questions on MY, and furthermore, that I’m doing so based on another answer to another halachic question on here. So with my CYLOR disclaimer out of the way...
I’d previously asked about teaching Torah to non-Jews, and I received an answer ...
3
The Igros Moshe - יו"ד ב' סימן קלב - writes that the prohibition is only when one intends to teach Torah to non-Jews.
דהא דאין מוסרין דברי תורה לעכו"ם, הוא דוקא כשכוונתו למוסרם להעכו"ם, אבל כשכוונת הלומד דברי תורה הוא ללומדם בעצמו ולמוסרם ליהודים הנמצאים שם, לא נאסר מחמת שנמצא שם גם עכו"ם שג"כ ישמע ממילא הדברי תורה.
If one teaches Torah and there ...
3
Tosfos understand that "Darchei Shalom" is not considered a gift. IMHO that means since you benefit from the resulting peace then it's not a free gift since its win-win for both sides. Similarly when you contribute to an online community you benefit that when you need assistance the online community will be available to help you. So it seems that since it's ...
3
My ancient Aramaic reading skills are exceedingly poor but I am able to understand concepts. I am not able to look things up in sefers and get schar but I am able to learn complex torah from the discussions of others on miyodea.
2
If someone writes something incorrect, it would be proper to downvote him so that other people do not learn to act incorrectly. StackExchange relies on downvoting (not flagging, as some people assume) to mark incorrect information.
Downvoting a wrong answer would be permitted as it has a clear constructive purpose. The Chofetz Chaim and other poskim all ...
2
The first mishnah in Avodah Zoro says,
1 During the three days preceding the festivals of the non-Jews, it is
forbidden to do business with them, to lend them something or to
borrow something from them, to lend [money] to them or to borrow
[money] from them, to resolve your debt to them or to have them
resolve their debt to you. Rabbi Yehuda says: ...
2
The real issue I would worry about when scrolling through a list of MY questions is the interdiction of thinking thoughts of Torah in a bathroom. Even if our current-day bathrooms are not the bet hakissei of halacha (there is some discussion on this, see e.g., beginning of this), the Mishne Torah (Laws of Shema 3:4) and Shulchan Aruch (OH 85:2) forbid ...
2
This is a very good and interesting question. On the outset we can eliminate the possibility of "lifnei Iver" in this case. The problem of Lifney Iver is if you are the person that permits the Avera.
Tosfoth Avoda Zara 6B:
מנין שלא יושיט אדם כוס יין לנזיר. נראה דה''ה בכל שאר איסורין אלא להכי נקט כוס יין לנזיר משום דמסתמא למישתי קא בעי ליה כיון דכ''ע חמרא ...
1
This may be an "opinion-based" question, so, I hope my suggestions, coming from an experienced Torah reader may assist.
First of all, halachically, there is no requirement for a Bar Mitzvah to read any part of the Torah whatsoever. The party is also not a requirement. I mention this only as this may ease the stress of thinking that you must do any of this.
...
1
Your son will become a bar – mitzvah (congratulations!) – the real meaning is that now he will be responsible for keeping the mitzvos. He needs to be educated in the mitzvos and how he is going to keep them in your situation.
The most desirable situation is that he should have someone experienced to teach him. As mentioned in the comments, the most likely ...
1
I am an Italian Noahide who has been attending this great forum for some years. Given that this question concerns us Gentiles, I take the liberty of trying to give my own interpretative answer, even if I realize that I am a mere amateur on the subject.
We read in Rambam's Mishneh Torah-Hilchot Melachim 10: 9-10 (English translation by Rabbi Eliyahu Touger):
&...
1
I don't know halachic implications, but my experience in gerut and as zera Yisrael, that "non-Jew" is categorically a catch-all, and therefore has no real meaning. "Goy" is different than "Ger", and even within these categories textually and temporally have had different meanings that presumably influenced halacha. For example, ...
1
The Gemara is stating that learning halachos everyday makes him a בן עולם הבא. Would he commit actions that disallow him from עולם הבא, that will not be the case.
1
One argument that it would be "a crown to magnify yourself": the "Association reward" that a user recieves when they reach 200 reputation points on any stackexchange. Namely, they automatically get bumped up 100 points on any other stack exchange they join, in order to get them past the "basic user" stage, as they have proven ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible