A message from our CEO about the future of Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange. Read now.

Hot answers tagged

19

In this particular case R. Lau was upholding the UOR’s ruling. The latter’s ruling (viewable here) was based on Rema (EH 154:21), citing earlier authorities, who permits to withhold any aid to a “sarvan” (one refusing to grant a get) including circumcising or burying his children. Upon this precedent the UOR ruled that preventing the mother’s burial is ...


5

The rules of disinterment are quite strict (see SA YD 363:1), dinonline has a good summary. The case you ask about is not part of the list, nor are there any cases of pressuring a family member. A beit din would have to be asked but the "burden of proof" appears much higher than a delayed burial. Several exceptions to the prohibition are mentioned by the ...


4

As Oliver stated the specific ruling is based on the Rema, but the reason the Rema (and others) allowed refusing burial to the family of a get-refuser is not mentioned so I'm adding it here. The origin of the idea of refusing burial to the family of a get-refuser or other person on violation of a beit din is Paltoi Gaon (841-858). He includes several ...


2

Yes ,I believe the Noda B'Yehuda would disagree. In Yoreh Deah Tinyana siman 30 he notes that dreams are not reliable and writes " where do we ever see halacha learned from a dream!?!?".further in the teshuva he writes " to bring a proof from a dream is nonsense and nothing at all". He is discussing a case about a certain fish(barbuta) which was debatable ...


2

The Gemara addresses this in 19b, and Rashi there explains the mishna; he says the issue here is that yibbum and chalitzah both clash with the obligation of a king's honor. Chalitza -- to have him summoned before the court and for someone to spit in front of him; yibbum (this is cool!) -- for him to say "I'm filling in for my dead brother" ... the king ...


1

In this answer a man with amputated legs above the knee cannot do Chalitza and would normally have to do Yibbum whether sefaradi or ashkenazi. Seridei Eish III 49 quoting Or zarua 665. So if this amputee is also forbidden by a Negative commandment to marry this woman in these cases: a Petzua Daka - he has crushed genitals and cannot marry a Yisraelis (...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible