If someone is sufficiently ill on Yom Kippur to be halachically allowed to eat, would there be any value in him fasting for a whole day after he gets well? I'm sure it would be voluntary, but is it ever encouraged? Anything from the Sources?

  • To be halachically allowed to eat? Or halachically required? – DonielF Sep 18 '18 at 13:43
  • This has to be a new record. +6, but no comments and just 36 views. – DonielF Sep 18 '18 at 13:44

Answer one is absolutely correct furthermore we only find this concept of making up a fast in a fast which we took upon ourselves. That which the Torah or the rabbi's command are for a specific date and if one can't fast on that date then there is no fast. Making up a fast is only when we promised to fast on a day not obligated by the Torah or rabbis and that obligation comes from our own neder or vow. Our own vows we can make up, not specific perscribed days. This is because our vow doesn't really mean specifically that day, but to afflict ourselves as an atonement and for retrospection. This can really be done any day therefore can be made up. Vows can be made up time doesn't return.

| improve this answer | |

In general, if one cannot fast Yom Kippur and is directed not to fast by his/her LOR then it is likely to be considered a case of Pikuach Nefesh and it is even considered a mitzva to break one's fast to preserve their life!

I dont have any sources off hand, but it is common knowledge in mainstream Judaism that when once is patur (exempt) from something such as fasting, they do not need to "make it up" as their obligation to fast has been discharged.

| improve this answer | |
  • @TheThinkingYid Not true. There are some cases where a person has to make up their fast. – chacham Nisan Oct 7 '18 at 19:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .