3

According to the Rosh (Moed Katan 3:43), a garment worn solely to absorb sweat is not considered a בגד (with regard to the obligation of מצות קריעה - mournful rending). This principle is invoked by later authorities to exempt four-cornered undershirts from tzitzith (see, e.g., Tekhelet V'Argaman 5, s.v. apikresin, citing Rav Chaim Kanievski; Shu"t Chemdath Tzvi 3:3; and Shevet Miyehudah, Ki Teitzei, cited here). Seemingly, even those who argue, agree that this is because the undershirt does have functional garment benefits (ibid):

Yet, it does not appear that our undershirts are made solely for the purpose of absorbing sweat, for they also serve to provide a degree of warmth in the winter, and a degree of comfort in their touch. Moreover, they are sometimes worn alone, for instance when playing sport–though it stands to reason that this does not give them any great importance, for it is the way of sportsmen to wear ‘undershirts’ alone.

What about a garment worn solely for ritual purposes. For example, if one wraps oneself in an American flag on July 4th, it might be argued that the fact that it is visible gives it a "fashion"-like garment function. But if there was an unusual (hypothetical) custom to hide the flag between one's undershirt and shirt, there would seem to be no garment-like function at all.

Accordingly, why would an otherwise functionless (at least on warm days) traditional tallit katan be obligated in tzitzit? Is the reasoning that a garment functional in winter, is also considered a בגד when worn in summer? Likewise, is a tallit gadol only obligated in tzitzit if simultaneously otherwise functional? (Similarly, would the same reasoning apply with regard to carrying on Shabbos and מצות קריעה?)

  • 1
    According to 4 USC, the US flag should not be used as a garment. So in that specific example the answer would be no. I am curious about the general case. – Codes with Hammer Aug 15 '18 at 19:17
  • 2
    I don't see what bringing a flag and July 4 into this helps at all. Just argue straight from undershirts to Talit Katan. Especially with such prominent titular placement it's really distracting – Double AA Aug 15 '18 at 19:17
  • 2
    ... and case in point someone posted an answer showing they totally misunderstood the question. Please edit!! – Double AA Aug 15 '18 at 19:24
  • @CodeswithHammer I see your legalese and raise you the First Amendment. – DonielF Aug 15 '18 at 20:00
4

Indeed, perhaps a functionless tallit is not obligated in tzitzit. This seems to have been the opinion of R. Avraham Yeshaya Karelitz, at least:

Shilhi Dekayta Siman 8

וכששטחתי את גליונות הספר קמיה מורי הגר"ח קניבסקי שליט"א אמר הגר"ח שגם לדעתו אכן צריכים הנאת לבישה מהציצית וכן מוכח ממנהג החזו"א זצ"ל שהורה שלא לילך בקיץ כציצית מצמר למרות שלדעת חלק מהראשונים דוקא ציצית זו חייבת מדאוריתא בד' כנפות וכנראה דס"ל דכשמתענה מלבישתו אזי חסר בהנאת הבגד ומשו"כ אי"ז בגד הראוי לציצית ואכן מן הראוי לפרסם סימן זה אך יש להדגיש שהדברים אינם מוסכמים ולא בכל עת שרב אכן פטור מדינא מלבישת הציצית

Earlier in the siman he cites other contemporary authorities. Apparently R. Shlomo Zalman Auerbach and R. Chaim Pinchas Scheinberg disagreed, but R. Yosef Shalom Elyashiv agreed that the garment needs to provide some sort of benefit.

  • 1
    This becomes a tremendous Chumra on Shabbat, fwiw. – Double AA Aug 15 '18 at 19:26
  • 1
    +1 According to that reasoning, I would think a cotton beged should also be a problem if one is wearing two additional layers? (Interestingly, I believe Rav Mosher has a teshuva explicitly instructing a grandson to wear wool even in summer.) – Loewian Aug 15 '18 at 19:27
  • 2
    @DoubleAA Indeed. He mentions earlier in the piece that R. Moshe Feinstein permitted it on Shabbos even in the heat, stating that it's still considered a beged. – Alex Aug 15 '18 at 19:28
1

Rabbi Jonathan Ziring, in the lecture linked to above by DoubleAA, brings a Machlokes between Rav Aviner, who allows people to wear an Israeli flag without adding Tzitzis, since it has the status of 'clothing for honor', which do not qualify as a beged for tzitzis, and Rav Ariel, who says that if one is wrapped in it (and it would fall under Ituf), you are actually required to put on Tzitzis. However, it seems that it would still be frowned upon to enter into such a situation (both legally and in terms of the honor for such a symbol), and ideally, the corners should be rounded to avoid such an issue.

Others point out some other reasons for leniency, such as that there are not two corners in front and two in back - I personally don't see any reason why if someone is wearing it as a cape (or a tallis), that this leniency would apply, but it would apply if it is simply around their neck and all 4 corners are in the front.

  • While I sympathize with your apparent confusion, I don't see how this answers the question – Double AA Aug 15 '18 at 19:24
  • 1
    +1 Interesting since I believe the design of the flag is actually supposed to have been based on the (striped) tallit. – Loewian Aug 15 '18 at 19:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .