Neḥemia 8:7

וְיֵשׁ֡וּעַ וּבָנִ֡י וְשֵׁרֵ֥בְיָ֣ה ׀ יָמִ֡ין עַקּ֡וּב שַׁבְּתַ֣י ׀ הֽוֹדִיָּ֡֡ה מַעֲשֵׂיָ֡ה קְלִיטָ֣א עֲזַרְיָה֩ יוֹזָבָ֨ד חָנָ֤ן פְּלָאיָה֙ וְהַלְוִיִּ֔֔ם מְבִינִ֥ים אֶת־הָעָ֖ם לַתּוֹרָ֑ה וְהָעָ֖ם עַל־עָמְדָֽם׃

Is it possible to explain grammatically why there are six pazers in this pasuk? Why do these names, over all others, warrant such strong disjunctives?

  • 1
    The first quarter of Joshua 8:33 has four pazers. – Alex Jul 24 '18 at 3:13
  • 1
    @Alex Another good question. – user13937 Jul 24 '18 at 3:19
  • 2
    Is a pazer such a strong disjunctive? – Joel K Jul 24 '18 at 4:48
  • @JoelK If it's a weak disjunctive then we can ask "Why do these names get unusually weak disjunctives?" – user13937 Jul 24 '18 at 4:50
  • 1
    @HaLailah But the winner, with eight pazers, is Divrei HaYamim 1 15:18 – Joel K Jul 24 '18 at 12:40

The pazer is a weaker divider than the pashta, so all of the pazer notes are part of a longer phrase that ends at the word פְּלָאיָה֙, which is marked with a pashta. (In this case there is also a dividing munach legarmeh on וְשֵׁרֵ֥בְיָ֣ה ׀ in the middle.)

וְיֵשׁ֡וּעַ וּבָנִ֡י וְשֵׁרֵ֥בְיָ֣ה ׀ יָמִ֡ין עַקּ֡וּב שַׁבְּתַ֣י ׀ הֽוֹדִיָּ֡ה מַֽעֲשֵׂיָ֡ה קְלִיטָ֣א עֲזַרְיָה֩ יֽוֹזָבָ֨ד חָנָ֤ן פְּלָאיָה֙

This isn't unusual for a verse of this length. The reason why it isn't common is because usually, lists of names are divided into multiple verses. The 13 names of 1 Chronicles 1:1-4 are spread out across four verses, so there is no division necessary beyond the tipcha of each verse:

א אָדָ֥ם שֵׁ֖ת אֱנֽוֹשׁ׃ ב קֵינָ֥ן מַֽהֲלַלְאֵ֖ל יָֽרֶד׃ ג חֲנ֥וֹךְ מְתוּשֶׁ֖לַח לָֽמֶךְ׃ ד נֹ֥חַ שֵׁ֖ם חָ֥ם וָיָֽפֶת׃

On the other hand, the verse in Nehemiah also has 13 names, but they only take up part of one verse, so more subdivisions are necessary.

Since there are no dividers weaker than a pazer, long series of names in one verse usually end up with a series of pazer, sometimes followed by telisha gedola, azla/geresh/gershayim, and/or munach legarmeh, before the next divider (either pashta, zarka, tevir, or revi'i).

You must log in to answer this question.