7

A Hackintosh is a bootlegged version of Apple's macOS loaded onto a computer that has not been manufactured by Apple and doesn't have a license to run macOS. According to Apple's macOS license,

I. Other Use Restrictions. The grants set forth in this License do not permit you to, and you agree not to, install, use or run the Apple Software on any non-Apple-branded computer, or to enable others to do so.

However, Apple does not pursue any legal action unless the software is being commercially sold, even though Apple is very quick to shut down anything that threatens its business. Many options and techniques are available to prevent Hackintoshes from being created, but Apple does not use any of them and there are no 'hidden security settings' that will shut down Hackintoshes.

This article may explain some reasons Apple hasn't shut down, and even benefits from the Hackintosh.

Considering that Apple could have shut down the Hackintosh, but deliberately chose not to, would it be permissible to create a Hackintosh if one would not be buying a Mac for this purpose anyways?

  • This question, as I understand it, can be asked more generally as whether an unenforced law must be followed according to Jewish Law (AKA Dina d'malchusa dina). – Ploni Jun 11 '18 at 22:34
  • @Ploni, The question is more to ask if the written statement must be followed when other actions show that that what is written is not really intended. – Rafael Jun 11 '18 at 22:40
  • 1
    Is this any different than judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/31121/pirating-software? – Salmononius2 Jun 11 '18 at 23:14
  • 1
    Dupe? judaism.stackexchange.com/q/38386/9643 – Ploni Jun 11 '18 at 23:26
  • 2
    The discussion about "law" doesn't really seem relevant here. There's no specific law about installing Mac OS on non-licensed hardware. The only law in question here would have to do with violating terms of software license, which is enforced in some circumstances (e.g. when other companies want to enforce their licenses). This is a question about violating a contract when one party to the contract has similar contracts with others and is known not to enforce it in certain circumstances. – Daniel Jun 12 '18 at 3:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .