I don't recall, offhand, what the purpose of the Afikoman is. Is it supposed to "represent" the Pesach sacrifice?

If so - I'm curious about a common instruction I see in many Hagaddot. It says that one should not stuff himself so much during the meal that he has no room to enjoy the afikoman and feels forced to eat it. I got that idea. However, if the afikoman is to represent Korban Pesach, I would think that one should specifically satiate himself (i.e., intentionally eat a lot so that he is full) because the korban Pesach was supposed to be eaten al hasova - after being satiated.

  • This is the deepest question in fundamental understanding i have seen in a long time i wish more people would be on the same level and vote you up
    – user15464
    Commented Apr 9, 2018 at 22:38
  • @user15464 Thanks for the compliment. We do have numerous "fundamental" questions on this site, and I'm far from the person who asks many of these. But, I also feel that sometimes more "learned" people as I get a bit too absorbed in the "details" that we have to recall or (re)-discover the fundamentals of why we do things. This knowledge only helps us perform the details better. In some cases, we may discover that we've been practicing the details incorrectly.
    – DanF
    Commented Apr 9, 2018 at 22:53

2 Answers 2


The Rishonim dispute whether Hillel would wrap the Korban Pesach together with the Matza and Maror(Rashi Pesachim 115a s.v. Shehaya and Rashbam ad. loc. s.v. Korchan) or eat the Korban Pesach separate from the Matza and Maror (Rambam Hilchot Chametz Umatza 8:6-7, Rabeinu Chananel ibid). This dispute accounts for the variations in the text of Zecher Lemikdash Kehillel that we recite before eating the Korech (see Baer Heitev475:9 and Mishna Berurah 475:21). Some versions state, "He would wrap Matza and Maror and eat them together," in accordance with the Rambam's view. Other versions state, "He would wrap Pesach, Matza, and Maror and eat them together", following the view of Rashi and the Rashbam.

According to the Rambam and Rabeinu Chananel, Hillel and Chachomim:
Both hold that the Kezayis of Pesach offering was eaten right at the end (al hasova) without Matza and Maror so the Afikomen is merely a representation of the Pesach offering and therefore should be treated like the Pesach offering to be eaten when full but have a room left. Hillel just reasons that the Matza and Maror have to be together beforehand whereas Chachamim say one can eat them separately a swell.

The opinion of Hillel (Chachamim don't argue they just say eat separately if you want)According to Rashi and the Rashbam:
The main Matza and Maror were eaten right at the end together with the kezayit piece of Pesach lamb/kid in the time of the Beis Hamikdosh, and no Matza or Maror was eaten beforehand. So nowadays the pesach is not availlable and the marror is no longer a Mitzva Deoraisa, so the Afikomen at the end is a representation of the actual Matzas Mitzva which accompanied the Pesach offering. This is why Rashi and the Rashbam say Pesachim 119b:
אין מפטירין אחר מצה אפיקומן - שצריך לאכול מצה בגמר הסעודה זכר למצה הנאכלת עם הפסח וזו היא מצה הבצועה שאנו אוכלין באחרונה לשם חובת מצה אותה שלאחר אכילה - The Afikomen should be eaten as the main Mitzva of Matza on Seder night as a rememberance to the Matza that was eaten together with the Pesach Offering at the end of the meal al hasova (i.e not being stuffed but almost full).

  • Thank you. Very thorough answer. I will probably post a separate follow-up question related to Rashi's opinion.
    – DanF
    Commented Apr 10, 2018 at 13:49
  • Related / follow up: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/91204/5275
    – DanF
    Commented Apr 10, 2018 at 14:42

Here is a wonderful Shiur at Olamot that addresses all that you asked.

In short, it's a Machlokes why the Afikoman is eaten during the Seder, either because it is a Zecher of the Korban Pesach, or that it is part of the Chiyuv to eat Matzah, or because Chazal wanted the taste of Matzah to remain in our mouths. Over time, it seems to have become a weird hybrid of all of these Shitos.

As for not stuffing oneself, we obviously want to avoid potential Achilah Gasah issues. See there.

  • Delaying a vote until I read the article. "Achilah Gasah issues" might be cancelled if, in fact, it does represent korban Pesach.
    – DanF
    Commented Apr 9, 2018 at 2:56
  • 1
    @DanF np. Why would Achilah Gasah issues be canceled if that was the case? Commented Apr 9, 2018 at 2:59
  • 1
    I'm assuming that achila gassa means the same thing as "being full". If not, please explain the distinction.
    – DanF
    Commented Apr 9, 2018 at 14:45
  • @DanF Achilah Gasah is beyond being full (see yeshiva.org.il/wiki/index.php?title=מיקרופדיה_תלמודית:אכילה_גסה). This is also explained in the article at length. Commented Apr 9, 2018 at 15:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .