7

As a child I learned that a minor is not culpable for his or her sins and that any negative effect from those sins is borne by the parent (I don't recall if it was specifically the father). I would like to know what the source is for this idea.

This question is related

7

One of the places that this is mentioned in, is in Bereshit Raba 63:10

אָמַר רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר צָרִיךְ אָדָם לְהִטָּפֵל בִּבְנוֹ עַד י"ג שָׁנָה, מִיכָּן וָאֵילָךְ צָרִיךְ שֶׁיֹּאמַר בָּרוּךְ שֶׁפְּטָרַנִּי מֵעָנְשׁוֹ שֶׁל זֶה

"Rabbi Eleazar said: A man is responsible for his son until the age of 13: thereafter he must say, ‘Blessed is He who has now freed me from the punishment of this one'"

The Aruch Hashulchan 1:225:4 explains the reason for this Bracha:

ועניין הברכה הוא משום דעד עתה נענש האב כשהבן חטא על שלא חינכו כראוי, וגם הבן מת בעון האב, אבל כשנעשה בר מצוה אז אין האב נענש בשביל הבן ולא הבן בשביל האב

"The reason for saying the brocho is, because till now, the father was punished when the son sinned, because he didn't educate him well, and also the son dies for the sins of the father. But after the child reaches Bar Mitzva, the father no longer is responsible for his sons sins, nor is the son for Father's sins.

  • You say "till now, the father was punished when the son sinned", but surely that's not so - or not necessarily so. What might be sins when carried out by an adult aren't sins when carried out by a child, and therefore there's no culpability for the father. This is not clear at all. – Stephen Games May 9 '18 at 18:38
  • @StephenGames well it's not exactly me saying this. I'm quoting from the aruch hashulchan. If you have a better translation, feel free to suggest – aBochur May 9 '18 at 18:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .