5

A summarized account of the Apocryphal work Tobit (Tuvia in Hebrew) is supposed to appear in Bereishit Rabbah. (Source: Wikipedia) I have read that the midrashic account is connected to Jacobs vow (Genesis 28:22). Does anyone know where in Midrash Rabbah this account is located? (I could not find it in parshat vayetzei).

0
6

This appears to be a mistake on the part of Wikipedia. The reference seems to be to an Aramaic manuscript of Tobit published by Adolf Neubaur[i]. This 15th century manuscript apparently mentioned a "Midrash Rabba d'Rabba", as its source. Although the identity of this Midrash is not clear, see Neubaur's discussion there, it may be identified with B'reshit Rabbati, a medieval work based on the writings of R. Moshe HaDarshan. Regardless, the reference is not to B'reshit Rabba, or the rest of the Rabba series.


i: The Book of Tobit a Chaldee Text From a Unique Ms. in the Bodlein Library (1878).

2
  • Is this source an extant midrash collection? would you be able to identify where within Breshit (drashot?) Rabbati it is? – Naftali Tzvi Dec 17 '17 at 2:17
  • @NaftaliTzvi No it isnt extant in a classical Midrashic collection. Just in Neubaurs's manuscript. That manuscript says it was based on some other Midrash, called Midrash Rabba D'Rabba, but extant Midrashim that we have do not include it. – mevaqesh Dec 17 '17 at 3:14
2

I don't think there is any such explicit ref. in the Midrash to Tobit, nor is there any mention of Tobit in the Bereishit Rabbati (ed. Albeck) in the section of Jacob's vow. Dubious "connections" can be drawn between MR (Gen. Ch. 70) where the Midrash relates the tithes that Jacob designated and Tobit (1:7-9) where he too designated tithes on his journeys to Jerusalem for the festivals.

Alternatively, Tobit is reported to have instructed his son Tobias to present generous alms giving to the angel who aided in returning them safely (Tobit beg. Ch. 12) and this too is construed as a parallel to Jacob's oath uttered during his importunate state.

0
2

I concur with @mevaqesh that it's probably a mistake on Wikipedia's part.

Adolf Neubauer was referring to a midrash called "Rabbah d'Rabbah" that appears in a manuscript that collected different texts, one of them being an Aramaic version of Sefer Tuviyah:

enter image description here

The manuscript can be seen here. A full list of what texts are included in this manuscript can be found here.

Although Neubauer thought that this midrash was both in the hands of the Abarbanel and, l'havdil, Raymond Martini, and that this midrash should be attributed to the amorah Rabbah, Joseph Fitzmyer argued compellingly in "The Aramaic and Hebrew Fragments of Tobit from Qumran Cave 4" that this version was likely a medieval translation of the older Greek translation, itself probably having been translated from the even older Aramaic version that had been extant around the time of the Dead Sea cult (there are significant differences between the older Aramaic and the "newer" Aramaic, yet significant similarities in word-choice between the "newer" Aramaic and the Greek).

It's worth noting that a Chazalic version of the story may be found in Tanchuma. In Professor Yehoshua Grintz's edition of Sefer Yehudit he mentions Sefer Tuviya quite a bit. Near the end, when discussing midrashic versions of Yehudit, he wrote:

"...מה יסודו של מדרש זה? נראה הדבר ברור שזה "תורה שבעל-פה", קיצור בעלמא מיוסד על הזכרון. סיפור זה עומד ביחס ל"יהודית", כסיפור בסוף מדרש תנחומא (פ' האזינו ט'; וורשא תרל"ח 442) לעומת "מעשה טוביה". בשניהם נצטמצם הסיפור העיקרי למספר שורות ונקטם ראשו ורובו..."

Translation: "What is the basis of this midrash? It seems clear that this is an "oral Torah", a general summary based on memory. This story stands parallel to "Yehudit" as a story in the end of Midrash Tanchuma (Parshat Ha'azinu 9; Warsaw 5638, 442), versus "the Tale of Tuviya". In both of them the main story was trimmed down to a number of lines and the beginning and most of the body was cut off..."

It seems to me that Grintz's citation may be a typo. I haven't found a 5638 Warsaw edition of Tanchuma, nor does any version I've seen have more than 8 sections in Ha'azinu, but in the eighth section - which also appears in the 5639 Warsaw edition, there's a midrash about a nameless rich man who has a daughter who's been married multiple times and all of her husbands died quickly - just like Sarah in Tuviya. Then a relative of this man and his daughter comes from a far away place and requests to marry her, and thanks to a number of miraculous factors, he doesn't die. This is essentially the plot of Tuviya, but with much of the story cut off and most of the details removed, as Professor Grintz wrote.

Chanoch Albeck also said that this siman is a summarized version of Tuviya (Beresheet Rabbati, Introduction, pg. 15) and Neubauer also brought this midrash in his edition of Tobit.

2
  • 1
    Seems like this should be the right answer. Midrash Tanchuma, not Midrash Rabbah. – MichoelR Feb 5 at 17:35
  • Thanks @MichoelR, but while Tanchuma has a summarized, detail-less version of the story, Wikipedia was referring to an Aramaic version, and Rabbah d'Rabbah seems to be the only one to fit the bill, as mevaqesh already wrote. I just wrote this answer to add info. – Harel13 Feb 6 at 22:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .