The Halacha is that a Jewish woman may not marry a convert of Amon and Moav. Is there any way to know who is a descendant of Amon and Moav today?


No, the nations were mixed up in the days of Sennacherib the Assyrian.

The Rambam writes

When Sannecherib, King of Assyria, arose, he confused the identity of all the nations, mixing them together, and exiling them from their place. The Egyptians that live in the land of Egypt at present are of other nationalities. This also applies with regard to the Edomites in the field of Edom.

Since these four forbidden nations became intermingled with all the nations of the world [with] whom it is permitted [to marry once they convert], all [converts] are permitted. For when anyone of them separates himself [from them by] converting, we operate under the presumption that he became separate from the majority. Therefore in the present age, in all places, whenever a convert converts, whether he be an Edomite, an Egyptian, an Ammonite, a Moabite, a Kushite, or from any of the other nations, whether male or female, he or she is permitted to marry among the Jewish people immediately.

This Rambam is based off the gemorah in Berachos 28a

Interestingly, many poskim today don't allow DNA to have true halachic standing.

  • 1
    I'm really not sure what DNA has to do with this. One question is using DNA evidence as proof of death; another is questions of paternity (but even if Joe Jew finds his paternal DNA doesn't match his "dad" he's still not a mamzer, as maybe it was a non-Jew, they doesn't generate mamzerut). If someone shows up today and claims to be an Edomite, you'd have to show that his father's father's father's father ... (it's patrilineal) was a pre-Sennacherib Edomite. That's only feasible in sci-fi, to the very best of my knowledge.
    – Shalom
    Jul 8 '11 at 14:40
  • 1
    Nobody is currently willing to declare a person a cohen or not a cohen based on their dna. In theory, you could find the graves of edomites, look at the DNA and find ways of discovering who is a descendant and who is not based on the Y chromosone (which only comes from the father). But nobody wants to do that.
    – avi
    Jul 8 '11 at 14:46
  • 1
    Perhaps I should ask this as a separate question, but it directly affects the value of this answer to the present question, so I'll ask it here instead: What does the Rambam do with the g'mara in M'gila that says that Moav (see Tosafos) was not moved around by Ashur (or anyone else who came along, at least until the Purim story occurred)?
    – msh210
    Jul 8 '11 at 15:11
  • 1
    @Shalom, I'm not sure why you think old dna is sci-fi, look up the genographic program. @msh210 I think you are reading the gemorah incorrectly. Tosofot is trying to reconcile the gemora in brachot with the gemorah in Megilah, limiting the midrash to only Moav. Tosofot claims that the word Ammon should not be there, to fix a perceived contradiction between the gemorah in Berachot which discusses a convert from Ammon, and the gemorah in Megliah, which sites a midrash of what the rabbis said in the times of Mordechai. When midrash and halacha conflict, we side with halacha.
    – avi
    Jul 9 '11 at 18:31
  • 1
    Odd, Egyptians today are known not to be the Egyptians of old. They are mostly Arabs now because of the Caliphate.
    – avi
    Aug 18 '11 at 8:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .