0

In Esther 6:11 Mordechai was dressed in the royal clothing. Did Mordechai have to ascertain whether or not the clothes contained shatnez or was he allowed to wear them without checking?

  • I wonder if actors have to check the costumes they wear in productions. The cases seem related. – Monica Cellio Dec 6 '17 at 16:23
  • 1
    Why would this be different from any other piece of clothing? – Double AA Dec 6 '17 at 16:27
  • 2
    Also refusing to wear the royal garb may have been pikuach nefesh – sabbahillel Dec 6 '17 at 19:27
  • 1
    @ezra no, ownership doesn't matter for shaatnez – Double AA Dec 7 '17 at 1:32
  • 1
    @ezra Given what DoubleAA stated, I'm inclined to concur with sabbahillel's thinking. The phrasing in the Megilla says Vayalbesh oto - "They dressed him". It could imply a sense that they forced him to dress this way. Seems similar to the phrasing regarding when Yosef was first appointed "minister" and it also says that they dressed him in royal clothes. – DanF Dec 7 '17 at 15:36
0

As sabbahillel suggested in comments

there was no concern regarding the prohibition of wearing shaatnez: Mordechai was permittted to do so since he would be endangering himself by not obeying the King's request (Sifsei Chachamim to Megillah 16a, quoted in R Yosef Deutsch's Let my nation live, p. 293)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .