One of the hiddurim on my tefillin is that any letters which touch are erased and re-written before continuing. However, if I recall properly, the Kesset haSofer (Siman 7) requires that this be done lechatchila.

Considering this, why would this be considered a hiddur?

  • I don't understand what's confusing you.
    – Double AA
    Apr 26, 2017 at 20:10
  • @DoubleAA, why would it be a hiddur if it were required lechatchila? Apr 27, 2017 at 3:26
  • 1
    Why would it not be a hiddur if it's only required lechatchila? It's not invalid if you don't do it
    – Double AA
    Apr 27, 2017 at 3:32
  • he.wikisource.org/wiki/…
    – Double AA
    Dec 6, 2017 at 19:58

1 Answer 1


I no longer recall what the Kesset haSofer (Siman 7) wrote, but the Shulchan Aruch in Orach Chaim 32:18 - סימן לב - סדר כתיבת התפלין - writes that if letters touch then one may erase where they touch and there's no need to erase and rewrite.

אִם נִדְבְּקָה אוֹת לְאוֹת בֵּין קֹדֶם שֶׁתִּגָּמֵר בֵּין אַחַר שֶׁנִּגְמְרָה פָּסוּל, וְאִם גָּרַר וְהִפְרִידָהּ כָּשֵׁר, וְלָא מִקְרֵי חָק תּוֹכוֹת מֵאַחַר שֶׁהָאוֹת עַצְמָהּ הָיְתָה כְּתוּבָה כְּתִקְנָהּ‏

Obviously, there are lots of minor details, but that's the general rule. E.g. if their shape is now altered they need to be erased and rewritten.

What I'm wondering about your definition of Hiddur is: Isn't it more Mehudar to have a tiny erasure at the point of contact, as opposed to erasing 2 letters and writing on less-than-perfect parchment which tends to be "messy".

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .