2

If G-D Has no physical form why midrash which say Kohen Gadol saw G-D as an old man while the Kohen Gadol went into the kodesh hakadashim

I saw this in the midrash says and I don't know the exact source of it

  • 1
    Check out Berakhot 7a. – mevaqesh Feb 27 '17 at 20:32
  • 2
    Is there any reason you are asking about a Midrashic depiction of God as a man, while Scripture itself describes God in corporeal terms? – mevaqesh Feb 28 '17 at 2:08
3

You are not asking about a medrash, but about an aggadic story found in the Talmud, at Yuma 39b (quote from R' Adin Steinzaltz's commentary [embellished translation] on Sefaria.org):

תנו רבנן אותה שנה שמת בה שמעון הצדיק אמר להם בשנה זו הוא מת אמרו לו מניין אתה יודע אמר להם בכל יום הכפורים היה מזדמן לי זקן אחד לבוש לבנים ועטוף לבנים נכנס עמי ויצא עמי והיום נזדמן לי זקן אחד לבוש שחורים ועטוף שחורים נכנס עמי ולא יצא עמי אחר הרגל חלה שבעה ימים ומת

The Sages taught: During the year in which Shimon HaTzaddik died, he said to them, his associates: In this year, he will die, euphemistically referring to himself.

They said to him: How do you know?

He said to them: In previous years, on every Yom Kippur, upon entering the Holy of Holies, I was met, in a prophetic vision, by an old man who was dressed in white, and his head was wrapped up in white, and he would enter the Holy of Holies with me, and he would leave with me. But today, I was met by an old man who was dressed in black, and his head was wrapped up in black, and he entered the Holy of Holies with me, but he did not leave with me. He understood this to be a sign that his death was impending.

Indeed, after the festival of Sukkot, he was ill for seven days and died.

You asked this question a couple of days after we read Parashas Mishpatim, which concludes with a vision Moshe, Aharon, Nadav, Avihu (two sons of Aharon) and the Seventy Elders had at Mount Sinai (Shemos 24:9-12):

וַיַּ֥עַל מֹשֶׁ֖ה וְאַהֲרֹ֑ן נָדָב֙ וַאֲבִיה֔וּא וְשִׁבְעִ֖ים מִזִּקְנֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃ וַיִּרְא֕וּ אֵ֖ת אֱלֹקי יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל וְתַ֣חַת רַגְלָ֗יו כְּמַעֲשֵׂה֙ לִבְנַ֣ת הַסַּפִּ֔יר וּכְעֶ֥צֶם הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם לָטֹֽהַר׃ וְאֶל־אֲצִילֵי֙ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א שָׁלַ֖ח יָד֑וֹ וַֽיֶּחֱזוּ֙ אֶת־הָ֣אֱלֹקים וַיֹּאכְל֖וּ וַיִּשְׁתּֽוּ׃ וַיֹּ֨אמֶר ה' אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֗ה עֲלֵ֥ה אֵלַ֛י הָהָ֖רָה וֶהְיֵה־שָׁ֑ם וְאֶתְּנָ֨ה לְךָ֜ אֶת־לֻחֹ֣ת הָאֶ֗בֶן

Moshe, Aharon, Nadav, Avihu and seventy of the elders of Israel ascended. And they was the G-d of Israel, and under His Feet was like a brickwork of sapphire, and like the midst of the sky in purity. And to the leaders of the Children of Israel He did not send his "Hand"; and they saw G-d and they ate and drank.

And Hashem said to Moshe: Go up to me mountainward, and be there, and I will give you the tablets of stone...

So, the question could be asked not only of that medrash, but also of these verse. As well as of Yirmiyahu's and Yechezqeil's visions of the Divine Chariot.

Fortunately, this gives us many comments by medieval commentators to draw from.

Rashi says that they saw something like the Ma’aseh HaMerkavah, the chariot that Yechezkel saw. “And above the firmament which was over [the chayos’] heads looked like sappire stone, the image of a throne; and on the image of a throne was an image that looked like a person upon it above it.” (Yechezkel 1:26) And, in fact, Targum Onkelos on our verse inserts the word “yeqar” to say that they saw the “glory of the G-d of Israel”. This parallels Yechezkel’s description of seeing something that “looked like the image of Kevod Hashem, the glory of Hashem”. (Ibid v. 28)

According to Rav Sa’adia Gaon (Emunos veDei'os 2:10), there is a kavod nivra – a created entity that is Divine Glory. The vision at Mount Sinai and that of Yechezkel were not of Hashem, as that is logically impossible. Rather, they saw this kavod. The Rambam’s approach (Guide to the Perplexed 1:64) is similar to Rav Saadia’s, except that he writes that the phrase “Kevod Hashem” is a synonym; it could refer to either Hashem Himself, in all His glory, or it could be used to refer to the kavod nivra. In our case, the text means that they saw the kavod nivra. However, in Moshe’s later request, he was asking to see Hashem Himself, which is why he was unable to have his desire granted.

Rav Sa’adia Gaon writes that the shechinah is indeed part of the physical world, but that it is a kavod nivra. In fact, Rav Sa’adia Gaon holds that the term “shechinah” refers to any miraculous thing that reminds the viewer that Hashem is shochein beqirbo, dwelling with him. Thus, the pillars of fire and of cloud were the shechinah, as were the vision of Mount Sinai and of the Merkavah. Rav Sa’adia Gaon’s notion of kavod nivra can be a physical object. Therefore this vision could occur through regular, physical sight.

This is where the Rambam’s opinion diverges. He holds (Guide 2:6) that the kavod nivrah could only be seen prophetically. It is different in kind to the pillars of fire and of smoke, which were physical entities created miraculously.

The Ramban disagrees with both. In his commentary on the verse where Hashem promises Yaaqov that He will descend with him to Egypt (Bereishis 46:1), the Ramban says that “Sh-echinah” is a name of Hashem (which is why I just hyphenated his version, as I would any other name of G-d), not a created thing (nor a class of them). However, this does not mean that Mosheh and the elders actually saw Hashem in human form. The Ramban on our verse explains that the vision was prophetic. It would seem that in the Ramban’s view, a prophecy can be a vision of something that cannot truly exist.

This indicates that underlying our debate there must be a basic difference in how the Rambam and the Ramban understand prophecy. Even though the Rambam agrees that the vision was prophetic, he still argues that it could not have been of Hashem, because He has no body. But that brings us to a different question, and a different discussion.

To answer your question, it would seem that in the medrash, Rabbi Yishmael Kohein Gadol either:

  1. saw the entity G-d created, His Glory (as per Rav Saadia Gaon)
  2. prophetically experienced -- i.e. "saw" in scare-quotes -- this created Glory, and his mind cast this experience into the more familiar image of an old man (the Rambam); or
  3. received a message from G-d in metaphor form, and within that metaphor, He chose to represent Himself as an old man.
  • I believe the OP is actually referring to a Gemara in Yoma 39b. The story relates that Shining HaTzaddik knew his death was coming as he was usually accompanied by an old man dressed in white; this time, however, the old man was dressed in black, associated with mourning. As the kodesh kedoshim did not even allow angels to be in there at this time of the YK avodah it must have been the Shechina itself, there as a merit for Shimon's righteousness. – Shmuel Brown Feb 28 '17 at 16:13
  • @ShmuelBrown - corrected. – Micha Berger Feb 28 '17 at 21:47
  • You are not asking about a medrash [sic], but about an aggadic story found in the Talmud. The term 'Midrash', 'haggada' and 'aggada' are used interchangeably by Rishonim. See judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/53349/belief-in-midrashim/…. – mevaqesh Feb 28 '17 at 21:55
  • The Rambam’s approach (Guide to the Perplexed 1:64) Don't forget that he suggests that "under his feet" is actually translated as under "its feet"; the feet of the chair. This may or may not be relevant, depending on which corporealistic element you are focusing on. – mevaqesh Feb 28 '17 at 21:57
  • Could ‘seeing the kavod nivrah’ be something that could be compared to ‘looked like the image of Kavod HaShem’? In that case they didn’t saw YHVH but they could sense/experience/see His Glory or His Presence in this world, not literally, but through the things that they could physically and/or spiritually do? – Levi Mar 17 at 6:07
3

There is a similar Gemara in Sanhedrin (95b):

אתא קודשא בריך הוא, ואדמי ליה כגברא סבא

The Holy one, blessed be He, went and appeared before him [Sancheriv] as an old man

Seemingly, from the simple reading of the Gemara, G-d can take a physical form.

However the Yad Rama (Ibid.) says that to suggest such a thing is considered heretical.

Instead the Yad Rama gives two answers:

  1. It was not G-d Himself, rather it was an Angel, or emissary on behalf of G-d who appeared to Sancheriv.
  2. It was a dream, and Sanheriv imagined in his own mind a representation of G-d appeared as an old man.

These two answers of the Yad Rama may also be utilized to answer your question. Either it was a Angel, which can and do take physical forms. Or it was a dream, and the Kohen Gadol imagined it.

1

Gemara Berachot 7a:

Similarly, it was taught in a baraita that Rabbi Yishmael ben Elisha, the High Priest, said: Once, on Yom Kippur, I entered the innermost sanctum, the Holy of Holies, to offer incense, and in a vision I saw Akatriel Ya, the Lord of Hosts, one of the names of God expressing His ultimate authority, seated upon a high and exalted throne (see Isaiah 6). And He said to me: Yishmael, My son, bless Me. I said to Him the prayer that God prays: “May it be Your will that Your mercy overcome Your anger, and may Your mercy prevail over Your other attributes, and may You act toward Your children with the attribute of mercy, and may You enter before them beyond the letter of the law.” The Holy One, Blessed be He, nodded His head and accepted the blessing. This event teaches us that you should not take the blessing of an ordinary person lightly. If God asked for and accepted a man’s blessing, all the more so that a man must value the blessing of another man. And Rabbi Yoḥanan said in the name

This is a metaforic image illustrating the service in Temple on Yom Kippur which is figurative of an appointment in a precise material place between G-d and Jewish people representative. The whole service in the Temple has an allegorical dimension which plays with analogy between G-d and human king-judge. See in several places the Sefer Hachinuch, e. g. 95. In many places the chinuch explains the anthropomorphism of Tora and chazal as "from the side of the receivers", the language is addressed to men and is from human language.

  • Do toy have any sources for the last paragraph; the only one that answers the question? – mevaqesh Feb 27 '17 at 21:47
0

A person cannot perceive something without that perception taking some form of physicality. Peoples' minds tend to force whatever they sense into terms that they are used to.

For example, the way the prophets describe what they "see".

Yechezkel 1:5

And from its midst was the likeness of four living beings, and this is their appearance; they had the likeness of a man.

Similarly, we speak of people hearing Hashem because if ideas or words are put into their minds from outside, then they would interpret the concepts as the sense that their brains are used to sensing. People think in language or as pictures.

Thus the Kohen Gadol would interpret whatever is being perceived in terms that he could understand. Additionally, someone trying to explain what he has seen would have to use words to explain in terms that the language can convey. In modern times, someone might call something a UFO, while in ancient times they might have called it an angel.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .