I heard that there were 7 nations in Israel,.
why Shemos 3.8 only mentions 6?
-
Did you check any commentaries there?– Double AA ♦Jan 17, 2017 at 2:01
-
1@DoubleAA I admit I was was lazy (I only gave a quick look)– hazorizJan 17, 2017 at 2:02
-
1torchweb.org/torah_detail.php?id=399– rosendsJan 17, 2017 at 2:16
-
@Danno thank you, but I do not understand if they left in the time of Yehoshua why in the time of Moshe are they not mentioned?– hazorizJan 17, 2017 at 2:19
-
1Ibn Ezra says they were the smallest of all the nations, which is why they were not mentioned: sefaria.org/Exodus.3.8?lang=bi&with=Ibn%20Ezra&lang2=bi– MenachemJan 17, 2017 at 17:20
|
Show 1 more comment
2 Answers
The Girgashi are missing from the list in Shemos 3:8, like you mentioned.
Rabbi Naftali Zvi Yehudah Berlin in Haamek Davar poses the same question. Here's what he said:
והחוי והיבוסי. ולא אמר הגרגשי כאשר אמר אל מקום ולהגרגשי לא היה מקום מיוחד אלא מפוזרים בתוך שש אומות. ומש״ה לא היו תופשים מקום וכשראו שישראל נכנסים לארץ עמדו ופינו לגמרי מחמת שגם בארץ היו טפלים להאומות אשר המה בקרבם
(From Sefaria.org)
Translation (special thanks to hazoriz):
The Chivi and the Yevusi. The Girgashi are not mentioned because the passuk is talking regarding a place, and they did not have a unique place (a specific land) but were spread out within six nations. And because of this they did not grab a place (land), and when they saw Bnei Yisroel were entering into "The Land" (Eretz Yisroel) they got up and emptied completely since they were already secondary to the nations they were within.
-
+1 my partial translation "the girgashi were not mentioned becouse the pasuk is taking regarding a place, and the did not have a unique place (a sposific land) but they were spread out within the 6 nations. And becouse of this there did not grab a place (land), and when they saw that the Isrealits were endtering into "The Land" the got up and emptied completely since already in "The Land" they were secondary to the nations which they were within them"– hazorizJan 17, 2017 at 2:56
-
@hazoriz - Fairly good translation. That is what I read. I did not know how to accurately translate it though and so I left it untranslated.– ezraJan 17, 2017 at 15:19
Ibn Ezra says they were the smallest of all the nations, which is why they were not mentioned: http://sefaria.org/Exodus.3.8?lang=bi&with=Ibn%20Ezra&lang2=bi
Ramban on the verse says that they are not mentioned because their land was not blessed with milk and honey