0

If G_d has changed Yaacov's name to Yisrael, and that is the name he should be called, why then do we see both names being used in the same context. I had an explanation that he was called Yisrael when he lived in the land and Yaacov outside of the land (Mitzraim), but this dialogue takes place in Mitzraim. What is the explanation for this anomaly?

  • 1
    related judaism.stackexchange.com/q/704/759 – Double AA Jan 16 '17 at 17:04
  • "and that is the name he should be called" Why do you assume that? – Double AA Jan 16 '17 at 17:11
  • I would assume that if HaShem changed his name to Yisrael, that would be the name we are to call him. Otherwise, are we to ignore what HaShem has said and revert back to what we decide? HaShem changed Avram to Avraham, yet we only refer to him by the name HaShem gave him. – B A Malinowski Jan 16 '17 at 17:43
  • 1
    First of all, see the end of the first Perek of Brachos which discusses how, unlike Avraham whose name was changed, Yaakov merely gained a name. Secondly, why ask on this particular passuk when his names are used interchangeably ever since he got both? Wouldn't a better question be to understand what the difference between the names is in the first place and understand when each is used and only then ask how it applies to the passuk in question? – DonielF Jan 16 '17 at 18:28
  • My question really does go beyond this passuk, because I see both names are used interchangeably and wanted to know the significance in their usage. – B A Malinowski Jan 16 '17 at 20:22
2

Another reason for the dual name is when he is being oppressed, in exile or in other similar circumstances. When he has ruach hakodesh or is on a higher level, he is referred to as Yisroel. In this situation, he is acting as both Yisroel and Yaakov. He knows that as Yisroel he will strengthen himself to meet his son and acknowledge him as a ruler. As Yaakov, he asks his son to do him a favor and act towards him as Yaakov, the patriarch who is in galus.

Vay'chi 48:2

And [someone] told Jacob and said, "Behold, your son Joseph is coming to you." And Israel summoned his strength and sat up on the bed.

Rashi

And Israel summoned his strength: He said, “Although he is my son, he is a king; [therefore,] I will bestow honor upon him” [Midrash Tanchuma Vayechi 6]. From here [we learn] that we must bestow honor upon royalty,

Similarly,there are times he acts as the father of his children (Yaakov), and times when he is acting as the progenitor and prototype of the nation (Yisroel).

Vay'chi 40:1 shows that he is about to die so he is Yaakov again as Rashi says.

Jacob called for his sons and said, "Gather and I will tell you what will happen to you at the end of days.

Rashi

and I will tell you, etc.: He attempted to reveal the End, but the Shechinah withdrew from him. So he began to say other things. — [from Pesachim 56a, Gen. Rabbah 89:5]

He then turns to his grandchildren and dons the mantle of Yisroel, the one who has ruach hakodesh and will pass the blessing of Avraham and Yitzchok down to the next generations.

As explained

IS HIS NAME YA’AKOV, YISRAEL OR BOTH?

The notion that Torah is specifically trying to make us notice Ya’akov’s unusual double personality also helps us understand some of the strange juxtapositions of the two names, such as when he strengthens himself to bless Joseph’s children (Gen. 48:2-3). Though he is by now Yisrael, the text tells us that he is also still Ya’akov even when he acts like the former. The same occurs in reverse when Ya’akov offers his parting words to Shimon and Levi, telling them that his dislike of their militancy is not only true of Ya’akov but also of Yisrael (Gen. 49:7). Thus, though one personality will dominate at any given time, the other personality is always still with him.

It may be well be that if Ya’akov represents a more sheltered and passive approach to life embodied by his childhood, and Yisrael represents a bolder, confrontational approach embodied more in his later years, the reason for Ya’akov’s split personality may be rooted in his need to maintain the legacy of both his father and his grandfather – echoed by his appealing to the God of Avraham and the God of Yitzchak (Gen. 32:10). From this perspective, while Ya’akov’s youth resembles that of his passive and isolated Israel-constrained father, his adult life resembles the trials and tribulations of Avraham among the nations. In this sense, Avraham’s outgoing personality is also what Ya’akov took from his brother Esav which, as some have suggested, Yitzchak had hoped would have actually been embodied by Esav rather than Ya’akov. Yet for Ya’akov to successfully carry on both vastly differentiated legacies would likely require taking on a dual personality even during the latter period of his life. And this is apparently exactly what he did.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .