5

Rashi often refers to tzeirei as "kamatz katan" and segol as "patach katan". Why? In what sense are they smaller versions of kamatz and patach?

I understand that kamatz and tzeirei are תנועות גדולות, while patach and segol are תנועות קטנות, which has some consequences for sheva na and dageshim. Rashi's classification is going in a different direction. Does it also have grammatical consequences?

             Tenuah gedola       Tenuah ketana
Rashi big    Kamatz              Patach
Rashi small  Tzeirei             Segol
7

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .