Would Adam and Eve have lived forever if they didn't eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil?

"but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die." Genesis 2:17


Yes according to some. The Stone edition of the Chumash reads, "Since Adam lived to the age of 930, it was clear that he was not to die as soon as he ate the fruit. Rather, he would become subject to death, whereas if he had never sinned, his holiness would have kept him alive forever." This statement lacks any attribution.

The Ramban seems to say that death is a natural consequence of being alive and the text's statement is that by eating the fruit, man became chayav a death sentence for having committed a crime. Death became a punishment, not a normal part of the existence process.

  • 1
    very interesting, can you quote the Ramban? – kouty Oct 31 '16 at 11:19
  • I would be interested in seeing that Ramban, since in his introduction to Torat haAdam he takes as a premise that death is meant to be unnatural for Adam, and that man was meant to live forever, hence the reason why we mourn over something so inevitable: כי תולדות האדם לחיות לעולם, ומן החטא הקדמוני ירדו לטבח כולם. – Chaim Oct 31 '16 at 12:17
  • @Chaim I don't have it in English so I was surmising from my simplistic understanding of 2:17 ואין הכוונה לידיעה בלבד שידע שימות כי החיים יודעים שימותו כלם אבל הכוונה כי בעת שיצא יהיה חייב מיתה למלך והוא ימית אותו כאשר ירצה ולא יבאו לראות כבלע את הקדש ומתו (במדבר ד כ) ולא ישאו עליו חטא ומתו בו כי יחללוהו (ויקרא כב ט) אין ענינם אלא שיהיו חייבים מיתה וימותו בחטאם זה ועל דעת אנשי הטבע היה האדם מעותד למיתה מתחלת היצירה מפני היותו מורכב אבל גזר עתה שאם יחטא ימות בחטאו כדרך חייבי מיתה בידי שמים בעבירות – rosends Oct 31 '16 at 12:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .