3

Some critics of Genesis have noted that there is difficulty in understanding how Hezron and Hamul are considered part of the sojourning group into Egypt from the land of Canaan, when many notice that there is only 22 years for Judah to have grandchildren after Joseph's sale into slavery and also prior to Jacob's travellings to Egypt to see Joseph

In order to understand this difficulty, there are those who place the marriage of Judah to Shuah prior to the selling of Joseph to the Ishmaelite/Mdianites.

The following quotation is from the Puplit Bible Commentary:

The date of Judah's marriage has been placed before the sale of Joseph (Augustine, Aben Ezra, Rosenmüller, Drechsler, Baumgarten, Gerlach, Ainsworth, Candlish, Murphy, Inglis); but even on this assumption the task is arduous to make the birth of Hezron and Hamul occur before the emigration of their great-grandfather to Egypt. For as Judah was not more than four years older than Joseph (cf. Genesis 29:35 with Genesis 30:25), his age at the time of Joseph's sale could not have been more than twenty-one. But placing Judah's marriage at the earliest possible date, viz., in his fifteenth year, only substitutes an interval of twenty-eight years instead of one of twenty-two, in which Judah's son Er must be born, grow up to manhood, (say at fifteen) marry, die, and leave his widow Tamar, who, after marrying with Onan and waiting for Shelah (which would consume at least another year), must become the mother of twin sons by her father-in-law (for which another year would be required), and must see the elder of the two married at ten years of age, if his sons are to be born upon the soft of Canaan. On either hypothesis, therefore, it seems indispensable to hold that Judah's grandsons were born in Egypt; and in this case there is little gained by putting Judah's marriage earlier than Joseph s sale.

As a result to this assessment, how can anyone agree that Hezron and Hamul were part of the sojourn to Egypt when there is insufficient time for such events?

  • 1
    essentially the same problem judaism.stackexchange.com/q/50967/759 – Double AA Aug 16 '16 at 3:06
  • 1
    also similar judaism.stackexchange.com/q/65545/759 – Double AA Aug 16 '16 at 3:10
  • 1
    The Talmud ((Sanhedrin 69b & Sotah 11b -- according to wikipedia) says that Caleb was the father of Chur who was the father of Uri who was the father of Betzalel. I remember reading a discussion about how extremely young they each had to have children in order for Betzalel to be 13 when he build the Mishkan (remember that Caleb was between 20 and 60 when they left Egypt). I don't remember the details or where I read it – Menachem Aug 16 '16 at 8:29
  • 1
    @Menachem we know Calev's age more precisely than that. He was 40 when the spies were sent (Yehoshua 14:7). – Heshy Aug 17 '16 at 15:01
  • which means caleb was 27 as a great grandfather when Betzalel was born, if divided equally, Chur was 18 and uri, betzalels father was 9 when Betzalel was born. So Calev Chur and Uri fathered at the age of 9. the truth is that Adam and Chava had kain and Hevel before they were 1 day old see seder olam rabah. Basically a gentile will not really understand as he only believes in what he sees nowadays – user15464 Oct 29 '17 at 0:15
-1

The Gemara asks this question and answers that in the earlier generations people used to give birth at a younger age.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .