3

Those who work in trades can often find themselves in a clients home (residential) where the toilet has been removed so work can be done. I, personally, listen to Torah Audio. I am aware it is forbidden to think thoughts of kedusha, Torah, etc. in a bathroom.

But if the toilet has been removed, is it now muttar to act regularly? Does there have to be a certain amount of time between removal and casual behavior (speaking, thinking Torah, etc.)?

1

This is a rather complex question. I recommend gleaning what you can from this great article on the subject matter, and discussing this with a good rav. I will, bli neder try to do this with my rav. If possible, edit my answer afterwards. I shall summarize the article's main points.

The source of not allowing Torah thoughts, reciting shema, etc, originates from the verse Deuteronomy 23:15:

כִּי֩ יְהוָ֨ה אֱלֹהֶ֜יךָ מִתְהַלֵּ֣ךְ ׀ בְּקֶ֣רֶב מַחֲנֶ֗ךָ לְהַצִּֽילְךָ֙ וְלָתֵ֤ת אֹיְבֶ֙יךָ֙ לְפָנֶ֔יךָ וְהָיָ֥ה מַחֲנֶ֖יךָ קָד֑וֹשׁ וְלֹֽא־יִרְאֶ֤ה בְךָ֙ עֶרְוַ֣ת דָּבָ֔ר וְשָׁ֖ב מֵאַחֲרֶֽיךָ׃ )

For the LORD thy God walketh in the midst of thy camp, to deliver thee, and to give up thine enemies before thee; therefore shall thy camp be holy; that He see no unseemly thing in thee, and turn away from thee.

Making the camp "holy", in this case, means distancing oneself from צואה - feces. (See the verses preceding the one that I cited to understand why.)

Thus, the concern is dealing with a permanent bet hakiseh - a room designated for use of relieving oneself. According to most opinions, one may not think Torah thoughts in a permanent bet hakiseh even if there is no excrement present there.

The flip side of the problem is whether today's modern "bathrooms" fit the Talmudic definition of bet hakiseh since excrement is flushed down and is rarely present.

That's the part of the discussion you need to read and discuss further with a rav.

  • Additionally, since the "toilet has been removed" the room can no longer be used as a bet hakiseh thus the question is does it still have the original status? – sabbahillel Jan 21 '16 at 21:06
  • @sabbahillel a valid question. My thinking is that in the discussion, above, it says that a "permanent" bet hakiseh may not be used even when there is no excrement present. I infer from that, that it is the room status that determines its prohibition, and not the presence of excrement or even a toilet. Logically, then, the temporary removable of the toilet still designates that space as a bet hakiseh, unless that room will be transformed into some other type of room. I don't think that's what the OP implies. Therefore, it seems that the only question relates to today's bathrooms. – DanF Jan 21 '16 at 21:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .