3

I am having a hard time in understanding these biblical verses:

And the sons of Reuben the first-born of Israel—for he was the first-born; but, forasmuch as he defiled his father's couch, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph the son of Israel, yet not so that he was to be reckoned in the genealogy as first-born. For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came he that is the prince; but the birthright was Joseph's—
― 1 Chronicles 5:1–2 (JPS)

If [as I understand], one of the rights of being a first-born meant the King and eventually the Messaiah was to be descended from the first born, and this passed from Rueben to Judah, skipping Simeon, Levi, what then did Joseph get with his being given the birthright? What does "birthright" really mean [in Judaism]?


The best and correct answer will correct any misunderstanding on my part.

6

The "birthright" as used here that went to Yoseph is the "double portion".

The Artscroll commentary on Reuven cites Targum Yonasan as pointing out that there were three items that had been originally given to the first born.

Rashi says:

you do not deserve to serve in the superior positions that were designated for you.

Targum Yonatan says:

But because you sinned my son, the birthright is given to Yoseph, the kingship to Yehudah, and the priesthood to Levi

Once Reuven lost the three elements of the bechorah, Yaakov divided them to the most appropriate children.

Yoseph as the firstborn of Rachel and as the savior of the family (and ruler in Mitzraim) was the most appropriate to receive the "double portion". This was expressed when Yoseph's two children were raised to the status of tribe in themselves. ויחי 48:3

Note that Rashi says that each of Bnai Yisrael received the same amount of land so that Ephraim and Menashe received the same amount in total that they would have received as the tribe of Yosef. It was only the honor of banners and marching as separate tribes that caused them to have a "double portion"

Ramban says that each tribe received 1/12 of the land which was then divided so that Ephraim and Menashe now received two portions of land which was the double portion of the "birthright".

Note also that verse 21 has Yoseph given an extra portion (Shechem) as well, though Maharshal says this was in gratitude to the oath he swore to his father. Others say it refers to the extra tribe as above.

@hazoriz pointed to (as well as other pointers in the comments above)

מצודת דוד על דברי הימים א ה, א כי הוא הבכור . ר''ל עם כי הוא הבכור והיה א''כ מהראוי להזכיר יחוסו ראשון : ובחללו . אבל בעת שחלל ובזה יצועי אביו ובלבלה לבל יהא מצוי תדיר אצל בלהה אז נלקחה הבכורה מעמו ונתנה ליוסף להיות נוטל פי שנים כבכור להיות בניו נחלקים לשני שבטים :

Rav Hirsch points out that even though Yosef is worthy of the honor of the bechor, he cannot become the leader of the Bnai Yisrael because he triggered jealousy among his brothers and thus could not bring them together in unity.

Note that in 49:26 Yaakov calls Yoseph "Nezir Echav" which means the "morally ennobled one" and not the crowned one.

My own comment is that we see that Yerav'am split the kingdom and showed that this flaw could still reveal itself.

Levi because of his zeal and feeling of brotherhood was fit for the Kehunah but because of his trait of anger the zeal disqualified him for the malchus. That is why Yaakov said that they had to be split up among the Bnai Yisrael and live on the terumos and maasros but not inherit land. This dependence on his brethren also made him unfit for the meluchah.

My own comment here is that we see what happened when the Chashmonaim took on the role of prince and king and how it led to their downfall.

Yehudah was the one who Rav Hirsch says in 49:10

This trend in Yehudah's character to have influence in the nation both internally and externally befitted him for "scepter and lawgiving style", to be the Lord Protector of both material and spiritual forces.

My own comment here is that he was the one who stepped forward to protect Binyamin, who recognized and admitted his mistakes with the sale of Yoseph and the incident of Tamar. He was the one that Yaakov sent ahead to Mitzraim to prepare the way for the Bnai Yisrael to live in Goshen. He was thus the one who deserved the Malchus.

As we see, Yaakov recognized that these three aspects that would normally have been granted to Reuven as the bechor had to be split to three different elements of his children.

  • Thank you so much! My reading of the Bible Simeon & Levi are linked in the revenge of the rape of Dinah, and Jacob doesn't want his spirit to glory in them because they are violent and angry men and their actions might have spelled doom for nation Israel, so why does Levi get something while Simeon does not? – FMS Jan 13 '16 at 4:13
  • nice information, but, bottom line, how does it answer What does "birthright" really mean [in Judaism]? – Danny Schoemann Jan 13 '16 at 9:11
  • 1
    @FMS As explained by Rav Hirsch and others Levi leads to Pinchas and Shimon leads to Zimri. The (minor) difference at the beginning points to the major difference at the end. – sabbahillel Jan 13 '16 at 10:28
  • @DannySchoemann As I explained, the "birthright" that went to Yoseph is the double portion. I also explain why the other parts (kehunah and malchus) are not the "birthright" – sabbahillel Jan 13 '16 at 10:30
  • 1
    @FMS Pinchas is a descendant of Levi and Zimri is a descendant of Shimon. Rav Hirsch and others point to a slight difference in the way Shimon and Levi each reacted to the rape of Dinah. This difference eventually led to the zeal with which Zimri took Cosbi bas Tzur and the zeal with which Pinchas reacted defending the torah which led to his being named a Kohen. – sabbahillel Jan 13 '16 at 19:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .