5

I heard recently a certain rabbi say that "nobody disagrees that [our "war" to conquer Israel] is a milchemet mitzvah."

What sources are there, either way, for conquering Israel today being milchemet mitzvah. Does that apply to all of modern day Israel, to all nations living there?

  • I assume you are purposefully excluding the (nowadays highly relevant) factor of defending Jewish lives in determining which wars are Milchemet Mitzva? – Double AA Nov 4 '15 at 14:11
  • @DoubleAA no actually, I'd be happy to see sources relating to that too....as long as it discusses relevance of milchemet mitzvah to fights in Israel today. – andrewmh20 Nov 4 '15 at 14:52
  • 1
    The rabbi was wrong: I disagree. – Adám Jan 10 '17 at 0:29
  • 2
    Who was this rabbi? This would likely improve the question – Noach MiFrankfurt Feb 8 '17 at 15:43
  • 1
    Maybe he meant "the wars to defend Israel"? That's more likely to be undisputed – Double AA May 8 at 13:16
-2

Rabbi Moshe Feinstein responded in 1979 to a question from Kfar Chabad -- "you asked me to spell out all the practical guidelines on the laws of milchemet mitzva applicable today. I only answer practical questions as asked. Nobody's asking me, and I wouldn't know what to tell them anyhow. Our job is to pray to God and have faith, and may He send Moshiach soon."

(Need to find it again in his books, bli neder.)

  • 2
    Where is that teshuva? – andrewmh20 Nov 4 '15 at 12:37
  • 2
    How does this answer the question? So RMF declined to answer bc he didn't know. Is that (surprising) lacuna just an interesting historical piece of trivia? – Double AA Nov 4 '15 at 14:09
  • 1
    @andrewmh20 The referenced passage in the responsum in question is here: שו"ת אגרות משה חושן משפט חלק ב סימן עח: הנה כמדומני שידוע דרכי לכתר"ה אשר איני ממהר להשיב אף להשואלים אותי ולדברים שלא נשאלתי לא שייך כלל שאשיב אף שהיה זה שאלה פרטית בדיני איסור והיתר וכל תשובותי אף להשואלים אותי היו רק בענינים פרטיים שנוגע להיחיד ששאל אותי ודוקא כשלא היתה פגיעה לאיזה רב, ושאלה כללית לא השבתי מעולם לא בכתב ולא בעל פה, and it seems irrelevant. His point is that it isn't a specific applicable question; but a broad general question; nothing to do with which war is a mitsva. – mevaqesh Mar 10 '17 at 19:07
  • The closing comments in the quotation from Igrot Moshe cited in the preceding comment are extremely significant comments from Rabbi Moshe Feinstein on how to understand any of his halachic responsa. This is one of other general rules that the author mentions which assign proper context to all of his words found there. – Yaacov Deane Jun 28 at 14:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .