These days I understand why the law exists, but why was it commanded from the beginning? It's still a little bit difficult to digest, but it's obvious that in Genesis siblings had to have relations to multiply. I also know that there's always an acception to the rule, but why did God command this from the beginning so? Couldn't it have been a law given much later on when it was possible?

  • I'm not sure what you mean by "there's always an exception to the rule"? – Loewian Oct 20 '15 at 15:35
  • I heard a Rabbi say it a few times in his lectures that I like to listen to. Like an extreme case or situation is allowed to break the law, for example a matter of life and death on Shabbat. – Pauline Spiteri Oct 20 '15 at 15:43
  • are you asking for all forbidden relations or just incest – ray Oct 20 '15 at 15:55
  • When does the law first occur? – Avrohom Yitzchok Oct 20 '15 at 16:02
  • Yes I meant incest – Pauline Spiteri Oct 20 '15 at 17:51

Perhaps it is to convey that the laws of forbidden unions are essential to man from his very beginning and that the exception was for pragmatic reasons only. The concept of the prohibition, however, still existed. (Had the prohibition started later, that might have suggested that the law was not as fundamental as the other laws and was limited to a specific period of time.)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .