7

So, our colonists of the oceanic planet Mayim (yes, that's its name), of whom every single one is a Jew, have encountered a problem: there is no more room on the buoyant-colony-thing that they live in, and they can't get back to Earth (the warp-gate broke).

Then the scientists have a great idea: their children shall become fish!

Seriously, gene modification so that everyone becomes parent to a blue fish mermaid/man, fins and everything. Mandatory for all. Is this morally wrong?

Important note: this is important for the to-be-born colonists' survival.

Another note: This isn't gene-splicing so much as going into the coding directly and messing around.

  • 1
    Related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/27107/1713 – Daniel Sep 18 '15 at 17:38
  • Considering we are gene splicing genetics from non kasher species into kasher species and calling it kasher to eat i'm not sure that there'd be an issue. But i don't think the big rabbis have finished weighing in on this particular issue yet – Aaron Sep 18 '15 at 17:39
  • 2
    Welcome to Mi Yodeya, and thanks for this thought-provoking question! We have a couple of somewhat-related questions about tinkering with the human reproduction on three-parent children and IVF in general. I suggest that you edit your profile and give yourself a name! – Isaac Moses Sep 18 '15 at 17:44
  • how much do we really understand genetics? it is a bottomless wisdom in my opinion – ray Sep 19 '15 at 19:59
  • 1
    "Important note: this is important for the to-be-born colonists' survival." Generally except for the 3 cardinal sins, any prohibition is permitted in the face of risk to life. Assuming the situation is considered "risky" even if there were some prohibition, it would be permitted. – mevaqesh Sep 20 '15 at 0:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .