5

This question already has an answer here:

I would think that after the great amount of suffering the Jews had to suffer in the 20th century a whole lot of them had to review how the deity they believed in could let what was happening to them happen.

I would be curious as to how Judaism in a general sense answer this question and specific how it was answered post WW2?

marked as duplicate by Shokhet, Fred, Community Jul 27 '15 at 7:12

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1

firstly all these sorts of persecutions were predicted in the torah. ex. "And the Lord will scatter you among all the nations, from one end of the earth to the other; And among those nations, you will not be calm, nor will your foot find rest" deut.28

secondly, on the contrary the fact that the jews survived more than all other nations despite being the most persecuted nation testifies to the hand of God guiding them. can you imagine 2000 years without the israeli army? The Jew is supposed to teach humanity "for there is no restraint on G-d to save by many or by few" (Sam. 14:6) as explained in this lecture by rabbi cordoza:

where was God in the holocaust

  • "predicted"? More like "indicated generally" – Double AA Jul 27 '15 at 5:19
2

How about the Book of Lamentations? King Nebuchadnezzar? The Assyrians? Sennacherib? The Bar Kokhba rebellion being crushed? The Cossacks? ...Shall I go on?

The Jews don't need life to always be positive in order to believe in "our Deity" and we certainly didn't need World War II to tell us that we are susceptible to the wiles of our enemies while being in a stage of exile.

Those who, subsequent to the heinous acts of the Nazis, "reviewed" their relationship to their nation and to the God who brought them out of Egypt and gave them the Torah largely adopted the pollyannish notion that God's existence necessitates that He prevent troubles of any kind from taking place in the world. And many of them forgot the long history in that part of the world of Jews abandoning the covenant that our people made with God - and they certainly forgot the national curses which were enumerated in the Torah that were to come upon us in the event that we ever conceded to the delusion that the Jewish nation does not need God or His laws to reside safe in their dwellings wherever they may be.

Instead of Jews being asked by the non-Jewish world how they deal with the "problem of evil," I propose that the non-Jewish world ask themselves how they account for the evils that they have visited repeatedly upon our people.

The real question that non-Jews should be "reviewing" in light of a very bloody history of Jewish suffering at the hands of the nations is how they could continually allow themselves to abuse and murder our people while asking us to consider blame God for our suffering.

It is not for us to review, it is for the nations to take responsibility.

I and many other Jews tire of this kind of question. Even if asked honestly it tends to smack of derision and implies that Jews are in a quandary of faith when in reality it is the nations that should be in such a quandary, but largely refuse to acknowledge it.

Why don't people post this type of question in a reverse form on Christian forums asking them why, if they claim that "God is love", have they relentlessly throughout history murdered us, burned our books, and stolen from us? Or on an Atheist forum a question could be posted as to why, if they do not believe in God, do they feel the need to relentlessly attempt to get Jews to turn their back on theirs, while constantly standing with Israel's enemies - even to the point of arming them?

The problem, you see, is not how the Jews can still believe in their God, but rather how the nations can still believe in themselves.

I hope that this has given you some perspective in your quest to understand. Be well.

  • 6
    I agree with most of the substance of what you wrote, though I think the tone is too harsh given the seemingly benign intentions of the OP (even though OP's choice of words could be viewed as offensive, I don't expect it was meant that way). And your current phrasing seems to monolithically aggregate non-Jews (including the OP) into a guilty collective. That is perhaps unfair, and it does not have direct bearing on the heart of the OP's presumably well-intentioned question. All in all, I think this answer has great potential, but I would not upvote it in its current form. – Fred Jul 24 '15 at 21:36
  • @Fred I agree with what you wrote and I too was not going to upvote, but I did to counterbalance the downvote. Let us not forget משלי כ׳ו ה׳ עֲנֵ֣ה כְ֭סִיל כְּאִוַּלְתּ֑וֹ פֶּן־יִהְיֶ֖ה חָכָ֣ם בְּעֵינָֽיו׃ ענה כסיל . הבא להסיתך לרעה הודע לו אולתו : פן יהיה חכם בעיניו . וטעם שני פסוקים אלו מפורש בתוכם אל תען בדבר שתשוה לו אם תענהו ענה כסיל בדבר שאם לא תענהו יהי' חכם בעיניו : – user6591 Jul 24 '15 at 21:47
  • I made some changes and made it more general. I also removed the emphatic "Good day." How is it now? And BTW, to even say "God is a god" is hillul HaShem. As Rambam writes in his principles, He is not "one of a type." Be careful. – user3342 Jul 26 '15 at 4:15
  • 4
    If this is the sort of response you can get for asking honest questions then I really have to reconsider if this is the site for me. The incorrect use of lower case letter seems rather trivial thing to garner this type of response. – Neil Meyer Jul 26 '15 at 10:16
  • 1
    re lowercase cf judaism.stackexchange.com/q/22865 inter alia: I do it -- FWIW. cc @NeilMeyer – msh210 Jul 27 '15 at 2:33

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .