On Maimonides tomb is written the epitaph: “From Moshe to Moshe, none arose like Moshe!”

We can read in many sources (e.g. http://asknoah.org/essay/rambam) that this implies Rambam was the greatest of all rabbis since Moshe.

But what about someone like Rabbi Akiva? Wasn't he just as great or greater? According to the Talmud, Moshe Rabbeinu did not understand Rabbi Akiva's lectures.

How seriously are we supposed to take the "From Moshe to Moshe" epitaph, and what does it mean halachically?

This latter question is relevant because of Deuteronomy 18:15-19.


3 Answers 3


First of all, don't take it so literally. Exaggeration is allowed for eulogies, and I assume for an epitaph as well. Consider the fact that Rambam himself called his masterpiece Mishna Torah, the rabbinic name for Deuteronomy, he seems to have made this connection himself. But especially let's remember that Moshe Isserles has this same quote on his Epitaph, so let's not worry too much about this.

That being said, the way I've seen it explained was this praise was said as far as his being a Marbitz Torah, that means someone who brings Torah to the masses. This has nothing to do with intelligence or any other measurement of personal greatness.

This of course can be debated. Some possible contenders would be King Chizkiyahu and Rabi Akiva. But we can argue that Chizkiyahu did not personally teach Torah to the masses, he instituted a system where people would learn Torah, but he was not the teacher, see Sanhedrin 94b. Rabi Akiva, although being a teacher and having the unnamed sources in Torah Shebaal Peh coming through his students, according to his opinion(Sanhedrin 86a), did not reach the masses personally. Rather it was his students that did. Rabi Akiva taught the five through whom Torah was refounded (Yevamos 62b). (As I'm writing this, another level of understanding suddenly hit me what the loss was when his thousands fold group of students, who he seemingly did teach personally, all died.)

There are other personalities in Nach and Shaas who we can debate about as well, see for instance Bava Metzia 85b about Rabi Chiya, but that is the same situation as Rabi Akiva. Also Sanhedrin 21b concerning the greatness of Ezra: 'Ezra was worthy to have the Torah given through him, had not Moshe preceded him'. This is probably the strongest question I can think of right now on that Epitaph (@Mike pointed this out in the comments as well), but again we can try to say the case of someone who renewed the Torah to the masses, upon whom praise is showered as being worthy of giving it originally had he not been preceded by another, is different than someone who actually gave something original to the masses.

Also along these lines is the fact that Rambam's original, personal work was so widely received. This echoes Moshe Rabbeinu's receiving and giving of the Torah, whereas other works of law, namely the Mishna and Talmud were compendiums of many opinions. The works of the Geonim, although arguably personal and not communal, were not as widely accepted by the masses outside of the towns where their Yeshivos were. This is obvious from some letters of the Geonim, and the masses remained extremely unlearned.


On the Hidabroot website the following answer is brought in the name of the Chid"a (tried looking it up on Hebrewbooks, but couldn't locate it):

כ"כ עוד החיד"א זצ"ל בספרו שם הגדולים (מערכת מ אות קי) שמצא כתוב שלא היה שום תנא או אמורא שנקרא משה, והיינו דאמרי אינשי על הרמב"ם ממשה ועד משה וכו' שלא היה תנא או אמורא שנקרא משה

Loosely translated, the saying came about because from Moshe Rabenu until the Ramba"m no Tana or Amora existed with the name Moshe.

Text in Shem Hagedolim:

enter image description here

  • Any Gaonim or earlier Rishonim? Commented Aug 17, 2022 at 17:38
  • Geonim yes as this is under a gaons name
    – sam
    Commented Aug 17, 2022 at 21:37

I thought it said From Moshe to Moshe no one will rise like Moshe, meaning after the Rambams death no one be become as great as him. That qoute was said by my rebbe on Rav Moshe Feinstien hefsed, and that's how he meant it.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .