What are the overall rules of Muktzeh and its categories?

When is one allowed to move a Muktza object and for what purpose?

closed as not a real question by Double AA, Shmuel Brin, Hacham Gabriel, Seth J, HodofHod Aug 16 '12 at 5:03

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • There is a Sefer called the Halachos of Muktza by Rabbi Yisroel P Bodner that clarifies these issues very well. – Gershon Gold Jan 23 '11 at 17:01
  • As there is artscrool from Rabbi Cohen.Here is a challenge to put in a few words or parraphs the general terms something way more bite size that is shavah lkol Nefesh – SimchasTorah Jan 23 '11 at 23:45
  • 1
    Sounds a lot like a question someone could write a whole book about.... – Double AA May 6 '12 at 18:20

An oversimplification, since that's what's being sought: Muktze is something (a) unusable, (b) valuable-cum-fragile, or (c) useless for non-m'lacha uses, or (d) a support for one of the above. Something useless or valuable-cum-fragile can't be moved or used. Something useless for non-m'lacha uses can be moved only if it's needed for a permitted use or occupying needed space. A support for muktze has the status of type of muktze on it. See one of the books mentioned in the comments on the question, or CYLOR, for details; certainly don't rely practically on anything in this answer.

Update: A better answer, which serves also as an answer to this question, was posted later to another question.

  • (I've reverted another's edits to my answer, yielding my original version, which started with a disclaimer that I think is important to include.) – msh210 Jan 24 '11 at 7:17
  • Just in response Rashi and many other commentaries where famous for being able to take very broad topics and put it in a few words that is a reflection of an amazing grasp of a topic not an oversimplification.As any teacher or Rav must do also mike very all encompassing topics bite size and that is what I am looking for somone with a full grasp of the topic to summarize in a few words or pargraphs – SimchasTorah Jan 24 '11 at 13:40
  • Simchas Torah, even the Mechaber wrote over 80 simanim on muktze. msh wrote a practical summary which covers most contemporary issues in a general sense, but there is much more (eg- things that were not muktze but are now, things that could go either way depending on you intent/action before shabbos, what if you already picked up the muktze, potential damage to people, abnormal movement leniencies, etc. – YDK Jan 24 '11 at 16:28
  • 1
    @R'SimchasTorah, I agree with your comment. But I'm not Rashi, and I'm not someone with a full grasp of the topic. So my caveat that that's an oversimplification is I think in order. – msh210 Jan 24 '11 at 16:43
  • 1
    Is this question in a category of "asking a question which requires a book to answer"? – Shmuel Brin May 6 '12 at 18:20

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .