2

I was just looking at the Keset haSofer and came across an interesting halacha

ואין נוהגין כן אלא כותבין בנוצה ואפי׳ בקולמס של ברזל

This is to say that we may write with a metal kulmus * (pen for writing sifrei kodesh). I was under the impression that it is preferable not to base metal implements in the creation of holy things, as they can also be used for creating weapons**

What is his rationale for permitting an iron implement for writing sta"m and do others agree with him?


*R' Ganzfried actually specifies iron

**This is a kal vachomer (a fortiori argument) from the halachic preferences of not using iron implements to cut the strings for tzitziot.

  • 1
    Why should it be a problem? You could even use a wooden reed. – Shokhet Feb 13 '15 at 1:39
  • Isnt this a Chasam Sofer – sam Feb 13 '15 at 1:41
  • 1
    I only know of a halachic issue with building altars with iron... – Double AA Feb 13 '15 at 2:34
  • 1
    @NoachmiFrankfurt He wrote two different editions and IIRC he changed his mind about this point or something related. Worth checking if you can. – Double AA Mar 1 '15 at 2:00
  • 1
    Source requested for this bold statement: "not using iron implements to cut the strings for tzitziot." – Danny Schoemann Mar 1 '15 at 8:50
2

We only find the "no metal" rule in a single place; making the Mizbeach (דברים פרק-כז).

לֹא תָנִיף עֲלֵיהֶם בַּרְזֶל

There's the Posuk that states that no metal instruments were heard during the building of the Bet HaMikdash:

מלכים א ו, ז: וְהַבַּיִת בְּהִבָּנֹתוֹ אֶבֶן שְׁלֵמָה מַסָּע נִבְנָה וּמַקָּבוֹת וְהַגַּרְזֶן כָּל כְּלִי בַרְזֶל לֹא נִשְׁמַע בַּבַּיִת בְּהִבָּנֹתוֹ, מֵעַצְמוֹ הָיָה נִבְנֶה, לְפִיכָךְ בְּמַעֲשֵׂה נִסִּים נִבְנָה‏

But as the Rambam (הלכות בית הבחירה - פרק ראשון) tells us, the metal-work was done off-site.

ח: כְּשֶׁבּוֹנִין הַהֵיכָל וְהָעֲזָרָה בּוֹנִין בַּאֲבָנִים גְּדוֹלוֹת. וְאִם לֹא מָצְאוּ אֲבָנִים בּוֹנִין בִּלְבֵנִים. וְאֵין מְפַצְּלִין אֶת אַבְנֵי הַבִּנְיָן בְּהַר הַבַּיִת אֶלָּא מְפַצְּלִין אוֹתָן וּמְסַתְּתִין אוֹתָן מִבַּחוּץ וְאַחַר כָּךְ מַכְנִיסִין אוֹתָן לַבִּנְיָן. שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (מלכים א ה-לא) 'אֲבָנִים גְּדלוֹת אֲבָנִים יְקָרוֹת לְיַסֵּד הַבָּיִת אַבְנֵי גָזִית'. וְאוֹמֵר (מלכים א ו-ז) 'וּמַקָּבוֹת וְהַגַּרְזֶן כָּל כְּלִי בַרְזֶל לֹא נִשְׁמַע בַּבַּיִת בְּהִבָּנֹתוֹ': ‏

Point being, metal was used, even to build the Bet HaMikdash.

Back to Safruth. Per the Gemara (Taanis 20) we are supposed to be using a reed - that is flexible.

לעולם יהא אדם רך כקנה ואל יהא קשה כארז ולפיכך זכה קנה ליטול הימנה קולמוס לכתוב בו ספר תורה תפילין ומזוזות

Once we're not using a flexible reed then there's no real advantage to using a feather as opposed to a metal quill.

IIRC the quill has to be Kosher - so one could argue that a quill is edible whereas metal is not.

(I've seen people use a reed - some Sefardim seem to be particular about it - but it requires sharpening the reed every few words - making the writing uneven.)

Bonus: We use a metal object for Brith Mila - even though in the Chumash we see that a sharp stone was used.

וַתִּקַּח צִפֹּרָה צֹר וַתִּכְרֹת אֶת עָרְלַת בְּנָהּ

I cannot find a classic source for your assertion of "the halachic preferences of not using iron implements to cut the strings for tzitziot".

1

Sorry for reviving an old thread. The use of metal vs. other materials for writing is mostly based on practicality (writing properties and properties of the klaf), although there are those who prefer to use a feather specifically based on the concept that just like the klaf should be from an edible animal, so too should the kulmus.

Regarding the tzitzis portion of the question, I don't have the source off hand, but I've seen/heard that tzitzis should be cut with one's teeth. When I had my tallis cleaned, the proprietor of the store indicated that the frayed ends should be cut with ceramic scissors, because it supposedly makes it less prone to fraying vs. a cut with metallic scissors. FWIW, I did try trimming with my teeth and fraying was minimal afterwards.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .