Is a pool allowed to be used as a mikvah for keri, for erev shabbos, and Shabbos day? If so does the filter have to be off? Since it is not only made of rain water i am having a doubt. Please answer in a chabad or chassidic point of view.

  • Why would you think you can or can't?
    – Double AA
    Commented Aug 6, 2014 at 17:16
  • Because it does not only have rain water. Commented Aug 6, 2014 at 17:17
  • 1
    Which of my questions were you answering? (Don't answer here, but rather Edit your question to include your thought process, what you have checked already, etc. Doing so will help others best help you.)
    – Double AA
    Commented Aug 6, 2014 at 17:19
  • 1
    dinonline.org/2010/06/29/using-pool-as-mikva Commented Aug 6, 2014 at 18:11
  • 2
    A Breslov Chassid with Semicha (who really knew his stuff) that worked with my dad used our swimming pool as a Mikvah when he was unable to get to the men's mikvah before Yom Tov. It is not optimal, but it does the job. Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 0:50

5 Answers 5


The Gemara writes in Brachos

ת"ר בעל קרי שנתנו עליו ט' קבין מים טהור בד"א לעצמו אבל לאחרים ארבעים סאה ר' יהודה אומר מ' סאה מכל מקום ר' יוחנן וריב"ל ור"א ור' יוסי בר' חנינא חד מהאי זוגא וחד מהאי זוגא ארישא חד אמר הא דאמרת במה דברים אמורים לעצמו אבל לאחרים מ' סאה לא שנו אלא לחולה המרגיל אבל לחולה לאונסו ט' קבין וחד אמר כל לאחרים אפילו חולה לאונסו עד דאיכא מ' סאה וחד מהאי זוגא וחד מהאי זוגא אסיפא חד אמר הא דאמר רבי יהודה מ' סאה מכל מקום לא שנו אלא בקרקע אבל בכלים לא וחד אמר אפי' בכלים נמי בשלמא למ"ד אפי' בכלים היינו דקתני ר' יהודה אומר מ' סאה מכל מקום אלא למ"ד בקרקע אין בכלים לא מכל מקום לאתויי מאי לאתויי מים שאובין

The rabbis learned in a baraissa: A baal keri who had 9 kav of water poured on him is Tahor. when are these words said? (when he wants to daven or learn) for himself. But (if he wants to daven or learn) for others, 40 seah is required. Rabbi Yehuda said that 40 seah is always required. Rabbi Yochanon and Rabbi Yehoshua Ben Levi, and Rabbi Elazar and Rabbi Yosi Ben Rabbi Chanina: one of this pair and one of that pair argue concerning the first part of the baraissa. One of them said: Where the baraissa qualifies “when are these words said? for himself, but for others, 40 seah is required,” that is referring to a sick person who has regular marital relations, but for a sick person who sees keri accidentally, only 9 kav is required, and one of them said: for others, even a sick person who sees keri accidentally, it is not sufficient unless there is 40 seah. And one from this pair and one from that pair argue concerning the last part of the baraissa. One of them said that that which Rabbi Yehuda says that 40 seah is always required is only where the water is in the ground, but if the water is in a vessel, it will not work. And the other one said that it works even in a vessel. According to the one who says that 40 seah works even in a vessel, it makes sense that Rabbi Yehuda learned 40 seah is always required, but according to the one who said taht 40 seah works only in the grand but not in a vessel, what does Rabbi Yehuda add by saying ‘always.’ He means to include drawn water.

From the end of the Braisa, we see that Rabbi Yehuda says that drawn water is fine for Tevilas Ezra.

R' Shneur Zalman of Liadi (Orach Chaim 88:1) codifies this:

ותשעה קבין אלו אינן מטהרין אלא כששופכין עליו אבל לא כשטובל בהם בין שהם בכלי בין בקרקע עד שיהיה ארבעים סאה (בקרקע) ואז מועילים לטבול בהם אפילו לבריא ששמש מטתו אפילו הם שאובים These nine Kav only purify when they are poured, but not when one dips in them, unless there are forty Seah in the ground. [Once there are these forty Seah], even a healthy person who had relations may dip in them even if [the water] is drawn.

  • Thank you for the answer. What does the Alter Rebbe mean by healthy relations and 40 seah in the ground? Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 5:11
  • @DovidBenizri They can't (according to some opinions) rely on 9 kavim, and the water can't be in Keilim. Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 5:43
  • What about Zochalin?
    – Double AA
    Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 14:03
  • @DoubleAA turn off the filter Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 17:51
  • @ShmuelBrin Is that really necessary? It's a closed system
    – Double AA
    Commented Aug 14, 2014 at 17:53

For Keri a pool can be good enough since it satisfies the Takkanas Ezra, as mentioned above. For Hosafas Kedusha you would need a real Mikva.

It is possible to make a pool Kosher. If you allow at least 20 Sa'ah of rainwater to collect before adding the rest, and if the faucet is higher up -- causing the water to flow along the bottom before reaching the rest -- it can be Kosher.

  • 1
    Welcome to Mi Yodeya, Benny. Your answer would be much more useful if you provided some sources. Commented Apr 13, 2015 at 3:24
  • For Hosafas Kedusha you would need a real Mikva. How do you know that? Commented Apr 13, 2015 at 4:42
  • Moreover, the Alter Rebbe implies that one doesn't need a kosher mikva for Teshuva. I don't see why Hosafas Kedusha would be stricter. Commented Apr 13, 2015 at 4:50
  • Rebbe Chaim Vittal writes that the Arizal's mother didn't let him immerse in the winter since he wasn't well. Why couldn't he just wash in heated water? Likewise, it says to wash Erev Shabbos in warm water and then to immerse.
    – HaLeiVi
    Commented Apr 14, 2015 at 15:17
  • Perhaps the pool is better than nothing. A big difference between Takanass Ezra and Hosafas Kedusha is that in the case of the former you are being Yotzei something. There is no point in doing more. Just like tog can't not cross a street better. However, for Ruach Tahara you want to do more for more Tahara.
    – HaLeiVi
    Commented Apr 14, 2015 at 15:20

For normal mikva (daily/erev Shabbos/shabbos) if you don't have anything else, you can use it, and it's better to have the filter off being that it's not mandatory from the Torah. As for mikva that is mandatory it needs a proper mikva. If you don't have one, maybe you should go to a pool in the mean time (not so sure), but it won't make you Tahor. Just to point out, in Camp Gan Yisroel around the world, if there's no lake or mikva, people use a pool.

  • Thank you. It is good to hear an answer from a lubavitcher chossid like me. But why keri no? Commented Aug 12, 2014 at 23:12
  • As I recall hearing and learning a shower is bedieved more than enough for keri (See here for example, I randomly pulled it up from google: dafyummy.blogspot.com/2012/08/…. ) A mikvah is maybe a chumrah if needed, and serves other purposes too. Mens mikvahs arent even fully kosher for a nidah in most cases...
    – Jeff
    Commented Aug 13, 2014 at 3:02
  • @DovidBenizri I took out the mention of keri from my answer, I asked someone and they said that there was a gezeira that he needs to go to mikva which was abolished, but ask a Rov if you need to know for sure. I was initially under the incorrect impression that mikva for a keri is mid'oraysa Commented Aug 13, 2014 at 8:18

From DailyHalacha.com (a sephardic website): http://www.dailyhalacha.com/m/halacha.aspx?id=1215

A woman who is a Nidda can divest herself of this status only by immersing in a Halachically valid Mikveh, which is defined as 40 Se'a of naturally collected rainwater, that had not been drawn from another source. This means that a Mikveh must be constructed in such a way that rainwater falls directly into the Mikveh. If the water is brought to the Mikveh from somewhere else, either through human involvement or a piping system, it is invalid, and a Nidda who immerses in such a Mikveh is still considered a Nidda.

For this reason, Chacham Ovadia Yosef rules (in Halichot Olam, vol. 5, p. 143) that a swimming pool may not be used as a Mikveh. The water in a swimming pool has the status of Mayim She'uvim – "drawn water" – and is therefore ineffective in ridding a woman of her Nidda status.

When Chacham Baruch Ben Chaim Z”L served as Rabbi in Salsbury, South Africa, he sent a letter to Chacham Ovadia Yosef asking if he could permit the women in his community to immerse in swimming pools, given that no proper Mikveh was available. He noted that if he would not permit women to immerse in swimming pools, they would resume relations with their husbands without immersing altogether. Since pools are disqualified for use as a Mikveh only Mi'de'rabbanan (by force of Rabbinic enactment), perhaps it is preferable to instruct women to violate this provision, and immerse in pools, so as to avoid their violation of the far more grievous transgression, of relations during a state of Nidda.

Chacham Ovadia replied that a Rabbi may not allow people to commit a Rabbinic prohibition even in such a case, where they will otherwise violate a Torah prohibition. Halacha does not become more flexible in response to the "intimidation" of those who are prepared to transgress Torah law if a Rabbinic provision is not suspended. This principle is explicitly mentioned as well by Rabbi Moshe Feinstein (Russia-New York, 1895-1986), in his work Iggerot Moshe (Yoreh Dei'a section, 52; listen to audio for direct citation), where he writes that a Rabbi may not allow a violation of Halacha of any kind due to the threats of sinners that they will otherwise commit more grievous transgressions.

Chacham Ovadia added another factor, as well, namely, that issuing a ruling permitting the use of pools as a Mikveh eliminates any incentive on the part of the community to construct a proper Mikveh. For this reason, too, a Rabbi must not issue such a ruling, and should rather insist that the community take it upon itself to construct a valid Mikveh.

Summary: A swimming pool may not be used in lieu of a Mikveh, even if no proper Mikveh is available.


It really depends on why one is using the Mikvah, and "Men's Mikvah" doesn't help (other than to eliminate Nidah). For many, it is simply because there is an 'Inyan' and Mitzvas Anashim M'lumadah. In the absence of any clear reason why one is doing it, it would be very hard to pin down what Mikvah is acceptable. Specifically, without being very welled versed in Hilchos Mikvaos and clearly understanding the reason, it is impossible to evaluate what leniencies can be relied upon in defining a Kosher Mikvah.

Here are several possible reasons why a Mikvah may be used, and their implications in regards to a pool.

  1. [For Nidah & Geirus most pools are probably useless for a variety of reasons.]

  2. For Tevilas Ezrah (Keri), even a shower of Tisha Kavim Mayim She'uvim (9 kav-units of drawn water) is generally agreed to be enough (for example, see here Answer 1 or here). There is a chumrah to use a mikvah to adhere to other views on this matter, and Kabalah. Therefore it would seem that one could use a pool, though maybe not if one wanted to adhere to all the views.

  3. There is an often cited reason from I-forget-who that if a Mikvah can make someone a yid, how much more can it elevate someone who is already a yid. To fulfill this, one probably can't use a pool, unless this reason is more symbolic than anything else.

  4. It removes certain types of Tumah. Therefore nowadays, when we are all Tamei Meis, it won't help even if/when it is Kosher.

  5. A Sofer should use it in general and specifically before writing Hashem's name (It is not clear in Halacha the level of Chiyuv; at any rate it doesn't Pasel his Kesivah if he didn't.) Everyone should before the Days of Judgement (Rosh Hashanah & Yom Kippur). Many other reasons to use a Mikvah are given based on Kabalah, in many Seforim and by many Gedolim, predominately amongst Chasidim (and Sefardim?). But for all these, clear rules are hard to come by. One would need to know (1) which Sefer/Gadol one was attempting to adhere to and clearly understand their reasoning, and (2) Hilchos Mikvaos inside out, only then making an informed decision about what leniencies are acceptable.

  • Tumat Keri and Tumat Niddah need the same kind of Mikva AFAIK.
    – Double AA
    Commented Aug 13, 2014 at 3:27
  • Don't know why you are convinced it's not valid for a Niddah. There are Poskim on both sides.
    – Double AA
    Commented Aug 13, 2014 at 3:28
  • From what I recall, hearing from people building mikvahs - There may (likely) be an issue with even a tiny leak, they test with straws on the surface etc, you would have to test your pool. Also, there would be an issue with Mayim sheuvim, unless done properly. There are probably more, I just don't know the halachos well enough, but I recall that there are an amazing amount of problems that crop up with Mikvaos for Nidos.
    – Jeff
    Commented Aug 13, 2014 at 3:34
  • As far as them both needing the same mikvah, I know a shower doesn't work for Nidah, and I know that many say a shower will be enough for keri - halachicly, nine kav mayim are enough (maybe not tumas baal keri, but then we are already tamei meis...)
    – Jeff
    Commented Aug 13, 2014 at 3:37
  • 1
    @Jeff Try Keilim 1:8 to start.
    – Double AA
    Commented Aug 13, 2014 at 6:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .