5

It says in the halakha that a married woman may not go out into the public market place with "p'ruath rosh."

I have heard that this means "with uncovered head," but this does not seem to match up with the other uses of the term "p'rua" in the Gemara where it clearly means "disheveled/loosed."

In Masekheth Kethuboth (cf. Mishna, pereq 2, Gemara 15b-16b, 28a) it mentions a bethula coming out of the wedding canopy with her hair "p'rua" and goes on to explain that it means "loosed" and upon her shoulders and not simply "uncovered."

Additionally, the literal meaning of the word "p'rua" is "loosed/disheveled." So it seems that it begs the question that if Hazal meant to discuss hair which is either covered or uncovered why did they not simply employ the readily available terms of kisui and gilui, etc. Why did they choose a different word and give it an obscure meaning?

  • See Woman & the Mitzvot: The Modest Way, pp. 137-140, and especially footnote 46. – Fred Dec 15 '13 at 5:55
  • 1
    If I recall this is dealt with in Sreidi Eish, Even HaEzer 78. I'll try to look at it and provide a summary if no one else beats me to it. – Yirmeyahu Dec 15 '13 at 5:56
  • @Fred - he doesn't really prove anything - simply states that it must be so. Kind of circular. – Danny Schoemann Dec 15 '13 at 10:17
  • 3
    @Maimonist Here are images of S'ridei Eish III, §30: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. – Fred Dec 1 '15 at 23:58
  • 1
    @Fred - Wow, awesome. I will put these on my desktop within the hour. Very, very much appreciated. Kol tuv. – user3342 Dec 2 '15 at 13:25

You must log in to answer this question.