Can a woman delay going to the Mikvah on her Mikvah night? That is, if it is the seventh day and she is scheduled to go to the Mikvah, but it turns out to be inconvenient (for example if a friend's wedding is that night) can she push it off to the next night?

Additionally, what if the husband is in agreement?

Please provide sources to your answers.

  • 3
    This is an ask your Rav shaila,which can go both ways.
    – sam
    Commented Aug 18, 2013 at 22:40
  • 1
    @DannySchoemann Why is that preferable?
    – Daniel
    Commented Aug 19, 2013 at 13:39
  • 1
    @DannySchoemann - IIUC, the concept of טבילה בזמנה מצוה is not accepted as the halachah. Furthermore, all of our tevilos nowadays are anyhow שלא בזמנן, since a niddah can theoretically count from the very beginning of her flow, and a zavah can immerse even during the seventh day. (To complicated to explain more in a short comment.)
    – Dave
    Commented Aug 20, 2013 at 13:09
  • 1
    @Dave, I'm not sure I agree with you. AFAIK woman cannot start her 7 clean days without a Hefsek Tahara even if she's 100% sure she is not bleeding - and even if she is incapable of bleeding. So it's more than ascertaining reality - it's the start of the "going to Mikve" process. Commented Aug 21, 2013 at 9:24
  • 1
    @Dave, I don't see any Poskim mentioning an issue with delaying the Hefsek. On the contrary - some communities didn't do it on Shabbat or YomTov (Kitzur SA 159:6). Yet all Poskim mention delaying Tevila night. The Kitzur (162:1) says it's because שלא לבטל מריה ורביה אפילולילה אחד. Commented Aug 22, 2013 at 6:12

4 Answers 4


As sam and others point out this is a CYLOR question.

We have a sefer “Taharas Am Yisrael” by Rabbi S Wagschal.

In Chapter 9, Rabbi Wagschal points out that it is the woman's obligation (YD 197(2)) to go to mikvah at the proper time unless her husband is out of town. She may not delay teviloh even temporarily without her husband's agreement, unless she is ill.

FYI There's a lot of comment to read if you Google “delay going to mikvah”.

  • Additionally, what if the husband is in agreement? Does he state this is permitted?
    – mevaqesh
    Commented Dec 5, 2016 at 5:42

This is a typical case where one should ask a competent Rabbi. I personally asked such a question when it was extremely uncomfortable for my wife to go. The Rav told me that if I have a boy and a girl already and I agree then she may delay.

  • why does it matter if you've already fulfilled pru urivu? She is not chayiv in the mitzvah.
    – Orion
    Commented Aug 6, 2018 at 0:45
  • @Orion the woman is only allowed to delay if her husband is mochel/allows his wife to not go. When the husband has not fulfilled pru urivu then he has an obligation to "mishtadel b'chol es" I think is the lashon the poskim use i.e. every normal opportunity, within his chiyuv onah, to try and fulfill the mitzvah. So since leil mikvah there's a chiyuv onah, that's a time he's obligated to try and fulfill his mitzvah of p"u and therefore he by him being mochel, he's negating his mitzvah.
    – Binyomin
    Commented Apr 27, 2020 at 19:23

There are four nested questions. I do not addressed here the issue of the mitsva to fruitful and multiply:
1. Is there a mitsva for a woman to go to the mikveh when she is prohibited to her husband because of uncleanness or to get out of the problem of conjugal prohibition?
2. If the answer is yes, is there a mitsva to go to the mikveh immediately after the shiv'a nekiim, even independently of the presence of the husband, or independent of the opportunity to make the mitsva?
3. Is there a mitsva of marital relatioship at the night of the mikveh?
4. If the answer is yes We know a mitsva called mitsvat ona, a duty of the husband towards his wife, to ensure periodic marital relationships. Is the leil tevila, a greater mitsva? E. g. is leil tevila a duty even when mitsvst ona is skipped e. g. avelut or tish'a beav, to make the mitsva at the night of mikveh remains a duty? In other words is this mitsva greater than mitsvat ona?

a. For the first question Rashi in Betsa 18b understood from the Gemara that there is a mitsva, and not all prohibitions can postpone the mitsva. Chatam Sofer argued that nowadays the Tevila is already postponed because of the stringencies linked to Safek Zava and we cannot avoid to postpone the Tevila even because of rabbinical prohibitions. Bet Yosef follows the rule of the Gemara for several cases even nowadays. See further explanation of the Bet Yosef.

b. For the second question which is addressed in Gemara Nidda 31a, the conclusion of the Gemara according to Rishonim is that there's a such mitsva when we know exactly the right time of Tevila. But some Rishonim, e. g. argued that nowadays the right time is an uncertainty. So, according to them, no mitsva of "Tevila at right time". But the Bet Yosef (YD 197) argued that even nowadays we have a right time following the last halachic rules, the time is clearly after 7 clean fays, even when the woman did seen only a little drop of blood. Magen Avraham (OC 574, sk 5), Sidre Tahara (YD 184 sk 14) and Chatam Sofer (Shut YD 170 and 194) disagreed to the Bet Yosef view.

c. For the third question Rashi Berachot 24a learned from the Gemara that yes. Leil tevila is leil tashmish.

d. For the fourth question, Rashi understood from the Gemara in Berachot 24b that there is a special mitsva of relationship at Tevila night. Acharonim discussed if this duty is stronger than the mitsva of Ona. Sidre Tahara and Chatam Sofer said that it's not stronger and Bet Yosef did seen it as stronger than ona, as night before travel is. Chatam Sofer and ST argued even against the status of night before travel.

In conclusion LeHalacha velo Lemaasse. Following CS (reported in pitche teshuva YD 197) and SD, the Tevila can be delayed and according to the Bet Yosef no Tevila and no mitsva can be delayed.


  • link broken, would you be able to sort it? Can't find this on the internet archive
    – Rabbi Kaii
    Commented Aug 31, 2023 at 18:42
  • I think it's one of my chidushim. I don't find it sorry @RabbiKaii
    – kouty
    Commented Sep 1, 2023 at 14:21
  • ah big shame, I would have loved to see it
    – Rabbi Kaii
    Commented Sep 1, 2023 at 15:53

אסור לאשה לדחות את ליל טבילתה כדי לצער את בעלה, אפילו עם היתה מריבה ביניהם, מפני שמכשילה אותו בהרהורי עבירה, ולפעמים אף בהוצאת זר''ל. ולכן תקפיד שלא לדחות את הטבילה בשם אופן שיהיה.1

Sefer Ween Lemao Mischol vol. 5.

Translation: It is prohibited for a woman to push off the night of her immersion in order to pain her husband, even if they are having a fight, because she might cause him to have sinful/lustful thoughts, and sometimes even to spill his seed. Thus she should be cautious to never delay her immersion for any reason.

  • 3
    The case of the question is not where she is doing it malevolently.
    – Double AA
    Commented Aug 22, 2013 at 18:33
  • @DoubleAA there a forsure some Diyukim you can make no? Commented Aug 23, 2013 at 3:26
  • 1
    I added the translation
    – Ze'ev
    Commented Oct 7, 2013 at 19:11
  • 1
    Could you render "Ween Lemao Mischol" in Hebrew please? Commented Dec 5, 2016 at 16:36
  • Strange that very paragraph seems contradictory. First it says in order to pain her husband. And then it says for any reason. Also I don't see why him possibly ending up doing a issur is her problem. I dont think this would fall under "do not place a stumbling block before her friend".
    – Orion
    Commented Aug 6, 2018 at 0:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .