Eruvin 54a says that it was taught by Rabbi Eliezer ben yaakov that wherever it says Netzach, Selah, or Vaed it means it will remain so forever. "כל מקום שנאמר 'נצח' 'סלה' 'ועד' – אין לו הפסק עולמית" What is the difference between these 3 words?

  • daat.ac.il/daat/kitveyet/betmikra/leperush-2.htm -- different opinions about the translation of the word "Selah"
    – Menachem
    Commented May 1, 2013 at 15:27
  • Maybe there is no difference and they are synonyms. If you have some reason to assume otherwise, consider editing that into your question.
    – mevaqesh
    Commented Aug 9, 2016 at 21:55
  • @mevaqesh - If there is no difference then why the need for three different words? Commented Aug 10, 2016 at 16:46
  • @GershonGold Just because I could make my writing boringly repetitive by repeatedly reusing the same few words, does not mean that that is a good literary tactic. dibra Torah kil'shon b'nei adam.
    – mevaqesh
    Commented Aug 10, 2016 at 18:22

1 Answer 1


An Explanation of Synonyms in Tana"ch by Rabbi Sh'lomo Aharon Wertheimer (pp. 240-241) differentiates the 3 terms in the following way:

Netzach - continuous existence without change

Sela - continual periodic action, as in day after day or generation after generation (cf. T'hilim 84:5 "אַשְׁרֵי יוֹשְׁבֵי בֵיתֶךָ עוֹד יְהַלְלוּךָ סֶּלָה")

Va'ed - unlimited persistence (qualifying the phrase "בלתי בעל תכלית" from Sefer Ha'ikarim with the adverb "בהתמדה")

It says in the introduction to the section that they basically mean the same thing, and I for one find the differences very hard to pick apart even with the prooftexts here and there. The unchanging aspect of netzach appears to be its main differentiator. I think I can imagine the third one meaning having the capacity to go on infinitely, while the second one is more like having infinite confidence that for any given instantiation of the continued thing there was an instance immediately before it and will be one immediately after it.

It contrasts the first two by example of Rav Sa'adya Ga'on's list of mitzvos in which he refers to the mitzva of tzitzis as "netzach" because the Torah commands it "for their generations", and the mitzva of m'zuza as "sela" because it is "day after day and also at night". This sounds like the opposite of the definitions above, but no further explanation is given.

In the same section, it also lists two other synonyms:

Ad - stretching to remote points in time either backwards or forwards

L'olam - forever (perhaps meaning only into the future?)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .