The late Lubavitcher Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson zt"l had no successor as the rebbe of Chabad-Lubavitch. Why is this? Was it simply because he had no children? If so, why was nobody else appointed to be the rebbe?

  • 3
    Would you want to follow that act? (The impersonal you) – Hod - Monica's Army Apr 29 '13 at 20:37
  • 16
    @HodofHod Yehoshua did. – Double AA Apr 29 '13 at 20:38
  • 6
    @Yehoshua, and you don't think you could say that about Moshe Rabeinu? – Daniel Apr 29 '13 at 20:43
  • 2
    @Yehoshua I didn't mean you :) Moshe said it's important to have a leader even though he knew he was the ultimate prophet. That's why he asked for Yehoshua – Double AA Apr 29 '13 at 20:43
  • 2
    Is this on topic? – Double AA Jun 13 '14 at 14:37

There are, perhaps, several factors to consider:

  1. In Chabad thought, the rebbe is more than just a leader, Torah teacher, spiritual guide, etc. All of these roles, and many more, are outgrowths and expressions of his being the נשמה כללית, the "all-encompassing soul" of the Jewish people (see Tanya, ch. 2).

    Now, of course, barring an explicit statement by Chabad rebbe A that potential successor B has a נשמה כללית, there's really no way to know who's the bearer of one. But by and large throughout Chabad history, the successor was essentially "voted in" - often against his will - by consensus of the elder chassidim, which in retrospect means that they had Divine assistance in determining who that person should be. If, then, there has been no movement in that direction, then that may well indicate that there simply is no one suitable. (What deeper reasons there might be for Hashem to cause things to be this way? Perhaps the one indicated in Josh's answer, or perhaps others; אין לי עסק בנסתרות - I have no business with hidden matters.)

  2. On a more down-to-earth level, the dynastic principle is very strongly embedded in Chabad history: in the "main line" of succession, every rebbe since R. Schneur Zalman has been his predecessor's son or son-in-law. (This is also true of the Chabad dynasties that branched off from the Tzemach Tzedek's second through fourth sons.) The groups that instead followed a disciple from outside the family (R. Aharon of Strashelye, R. Avraham Dovber Levine) were, then as now, considered schismatic. Practically speaking, then, with the Rebbe having been childless and his other brothers-in-law (the Previous Rebbe had no sons) having passed away before him, there is no one who would meet that criterion.

  3. To address Shalom's point about plans and foresight: במחילת כבודו, that I think the premise of his answer is a bit mistaken. There were actually very few cases where the Lubavitcher rebbeim designated their successors (even when there were multiple possible candidates); in fact I don't believe any of them ever explicitly said, "X should be the next rebbe." The closest are the Tzemach Tzedek directing the Maharash to start delivering original maamarim (winter 5626, a few months before his own passing), and the Rashab similarly directing the Rayatz in his will to say Chassidus publicly. (The latter case was during the upheaval following the Russian revolution, which obviously was a situation where no uncertainty could be tolerated - and even then the Rayatz was reluctant to fully accept the position until, as in point 1, he was pressed into it by the chassidim. As for the Tzemach Tzedek, that his directive wasn't seen as necessarily designating a successor is proven by the simple fact that three of his other sons also accepted positions as Chabad rebbeim, albeit in other towns.)

    Of course, each of the rebbeim can be seen in retrospect to have groomed their successors for the position, but much of that was by assigning them responsibilities - which they did to their other sons, sons-in-law and other people close to them as well, so that's hardly dispositive. [Consider the Previous Rebbe: he appointed his oldest son-in-law the Rashag as director of Tomchei Tmimim, and his second son-in-law the Ramash (the Rebbe) as director of Merkos, Machaneh Yisroel and Kehot (his third son-in-law R. Mendel Horenstein was killed in the Holocaust) - but in addition there were responsibilities parceled out to many others as well, such as R. Nissan Mindel, R. Chaim Mordechai Aizik Hodakov, etc. When the Previous Rebbe passed away, then, there was a minority of chassidim who held out for the Rashag, a majority for the Ramash, and so far as I know no one considered anyone else as even a possibility.]


(I suspect this will get some downvotes or be seen as disrespectful by some. It's important to say nonetheless.)

That's a million-dollar question. No, make that a billion-dollar question.

It appears that as Rabbi Schneurson had no children there was no heir-apparent; in his last years after he suffered a stroke he was probably unable himself to choose a successor, and prior to that -- well I don't know what plans were made. Rumor has it that some believed it had been decreed long ago that there would only be seven grand rabbis of Lubavitch, and hopes were high that the Messiah would come at that point. But critics will tell you that succession planning could have been done a lot better -- it's actually a lesson for all of us to think about our wills and life insurance, unpleasant as it may be.

Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneurson zt'l was an incredibly great man in all sorts of ways, and he left some very large shoes to fill. (Critics would tell you that exaggerated language about his greatness only makes the transition after his death even more difficult.) Not to mention there is a division within Lubavitch regarding how to view Rabbi Schneurson's messianic potential after his death, this makes choosing a new rebbe harder still.

(Some have floated the name of Rabbi Adin Steinzaltz shlit'a as a possible eighth Lubavitcher Rebbe; besides the above difficulties, Rabbi Steinzaltz's background is seen as somewhat of an outsider's [his parents were not religiously affiliated], and his role as a quiet intellectual (of colossal stature, may I add) would be a great departure from his predecessor's public figure.)

The Talmud gives thanks that human corpses rot; Rashi explains that this forces us to bury them. Otherwise we'd leave the remains of our loved ones around all the time, and never cope with their loss. We take the memories of the dead with us, but then we move on. Candid friends of Chabad-Lubavitch wonder if they would have done better had they planned for a post-Schneurson existence.

  • 3
    Are the "critics" you quote suggesting that Rabbi Schneerson, a man whose huge success is due in large part to his organizational skills, forgot to plan a succession? (Don't say "stroke" - he was in his 90's at the time, it's not as if it was a huge surprise. Don't say "could have been done better" - that would imply that there were succession plans and that they just didn't work out.) Remember, we're talking about a man who was himself groomed from birth by his predecessor. – Hod - Monica's Army Apr 29 '13 at 21:03
  • 3
    Messianism is irrelevant to succession plans. If he had left plans (publicly) there never would have been the faction split in the first place. – Hod - Monica's Army Apr 29 '13 at 21:04
  • 2
    @HodofHod it's relevant to those who want to plan now for succession. – Double AA Apr 29 '13 at 21:08
  • 3
    It's also been suggested that he couldn't tell his followers "no I'm not the Messiah" as there were points in time where he couldn't definitively state that's NOT how history would go. – Shalom Apr 29 '13 at 22:22
  • 6
    It is worth noting that the Rebbe did start a campaign in the mid-80s of עשה לך רב, "make for yourself a leader" (mashpia, in Chabad jargon). I think that even at the time, and certainly in retrospect, this was understood to mean that Chabad will continue in a more "decentralized" model. Indeed, in a sichah many years earlier the Rebbe foreshadowed this by quoting a story where the Tzemach Tzedek said, "There are my children [to succeed me]; further, the achdus of chassidim will bring them to Moshiach" - on which the Rebbe commented that the first option is gone, and all we have is the second. – Alex May 2 '13 at 17:16

The Lubavitcher Rebbe perhaps did not have anyone one person to proceed him on purpose perhaps becasue he has more then 5000 Shluchim emissarys worldwide who have proceeded him and followed his mandate of 'Uforatzto, Yomo Vokedmo, Vetzofono Vonegbo', bringing a thirst of yiddishkiet to all corners of the world. What other leader do you know of charged so many of his chassidm with leadership ones who are committed there for a lifetime till the coming of Moshiach.

  • 1
    Are you the same person as judaism.stackexchange.com/users/1232/pinteleyid ? If so, you might want to consider attempting to merge the two accounts. If not, welcome to Mi Yodeya! – Isaac Moses May 3 '13 at 18:19
  • 1
    Pintele Yid, welcome to Mi Yodeya (or welcome back, perhaps)! If I understand you correctly, you are saying the Lubavitcher Rebbe decided not to have a successor because he has emissaries instead. Do you have a source to support this claim? Perhaps a statement he made, or a letter that was written somewhere? – Seth J May 3 '13 at 18:57
  • @seth pretty much every talk he ever gave, especially the ones about "shlooychoy shell awduhm kimoysoy" and later when he said he's giving the job off to "3 or 3 people" to end the exile, but not limited to that, but even that – bluejayke Feb 24 at 22:31

From the outset, the Rebbe was to be the seventh and final Lubavitcher Rebbe. It is an important part of Chabad theology. See here:

However, by Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn's reign there had been seven generations of Hasidic Rebbes who had followed the Ba'al Shem Tov, and six generations of Lubavitcher Rebbes. As early as 1926, Yosef Yitzchak emphasized the importance of a midrashic statement that "all sevens are dear to God." In the 1940s, after experiencing the depredations of Communist rule and seeing some of his family and much of his world destroyed by the Nazis, he coined the slogan le-alter le-teshuvah, le-alter le-geulah ("repentance now, redemption now").

Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak's last work was entitled Basi Legani, or "I have come into my garden," after the biblical verse, "I have come into my garden, my sister, my bride" (Song of Songs 5:1), understood as a poetic allegory of the consummation of the love between God and Israel, and also that between God and his exiled (feminine) presence, the Shekhina. It was delivered posthumously by Schneerson on the anniversary of his father-in-law's passing, in what was to become his first address as Rebbe. Schneerson consoled his father-in-law's Hasidim and himself by emphasizing that "the seventh is cherished." Just as Moses and his generation had followed Abraham by seven generations, so too this generation was now the seventh Hasidic generation, whose task was to complete the process of drawing down the Shekhina. The end of the address is worth quoting at some length.

  • 2
    Won't disagree with your first sentence, but I will disagree with the author you quote. The Rebbe did not deliver his father-in-law's work as his first address- he quoted a paragraph and then expounded on it. As he did every year following that on its anniversary. – Hod - Monica's Army Apr 30 '13 at 3:36
  • 2
    The way he writes about Chabad's writing style - I wonder if he's as derisive of Torah's or Gemara's. Layers of meaning are wrapped in a single sentence, as anyone who's well versed in the subject can unfold (some more, some less), but the "style" bothers him. A real mayven. He just casually tosses in "[The] fervent devotion to the previous Rebbe seems perilously close to crowding out other religious motivations" at the end. On what basis? He doesn't say. – Hod - Monica's Army Apr 30 '13 at 3:37
  • What does he mean by "seven generations of Hasidic Rebbes who had followed the Ba'al Shem Tov"? There have been substantially more than that; does he mean seven up until a point? Which point? Certainly not up until the Baal haTanya. – Shimon bM Apr 30 '13 at 3:50
  • @ShimonbM it should be 8 since the Baal Shem Tov (6 Chabad + Maggid + Baal Shem Tov). I've seen people writing about the Rebbe Rashab that he was 7 (since the Baal Shem Tov). – ertert3terte Apr 30 '13 at 4:46
  • @ShmuelBrin, That seems a strange way of counting generations, but if this is how some hasidim count them, then okay. Also, doesn't anybody take the Kapuster hasidim into account? I mean, they weren't "Lubavitch", but they were Chabad... – Shimon bM Apr 30 '13 at 5:07

I accidentally came across this site and wish to give a different perspective. First it's important to realise that the Rebbe was a unique person and that his legacy lives on in those who follow him and that no one could fill his shoes.

Sadly though there are those who were capable of guiding the Rebbe's Chassidim just as Breslov Chassidim have, for Breslover's there only was one Rebbe, Rav Nachman but they have Rabbonim who guide them and crucially they are involved with other Chassidus and the wider Orthodox Jewish world.

Unfortunately what happened in Chabad is that a sizable number believed and some even declared the Rebbe the Moshiach, the Messiah, this is not the place to go into detail but there are explicit sources to prove that the Moshiach has to be conceived and be born in the Holy Land as well as uniting the Jewish people and when explicitly asked the Rebbe responded that he was not the Moshiach and that he had tried everything that he could do to bring the Moshiach, a direction that many of his contemporary Rebbes and Roshei Yeshivot considered incorrect.

This 'Moshiach' group of people have made it almost impossible for Lubavitch to integrate in the way that Breslov Chassidim have done and their beliefs which have no source or foundation to them can even place them in a Jewish Law in a category of people who are actually non-observant even though they keep the entire rest of the Torah a bit like Jews for Jesus. Imagine a Jew who observes all the mitzvoth but belives that Jesus is the Messiah - this person has placed themselves outside the Orthodox camp and has strange alien beliefs.

In truth Chabad do not need another Rebbe but what they do need is for those who do not believe the Rebbe to be the Moshiach to split from those who do belive this but this could be very acrimonious and so the status quo has been accepted even though it has isolated Lubavitcher's from the rest of the Orthodox world. A tragic story given that they do much good and help many people but true non the less.

  • What does this have to do with the question? – ertert3terte Jan 14 '14 at 0:05
  • @ShmuelBrin "This 'Moshiach' group of people have made it almost impossible for Lubavitch to integrate" Sounds like an answer to the question. (I'm not commenting on the value of the answer.) – Double AA Jan 14 '14 at 0:53
  • @DoubleAA we're not discussing why Lubavitch has few friends in the outside, we're discussing why there is no successor, and it's not because of the Moshiach group. They don't have enough power. – ertert3terte Jan 14 '14 at 1:42
  • 1
    @ShmuelBrin So downvote if you think it's a wrong answer. That's not what mods delete for. – Double AA Jan 14 '14 at 1:46
  • @DoubleAA It looks more like a comment than an answer – ertert3terte Jan 14 '14 at 17:31

Because that would make the meshichist angry, because the meshichist, who, mind you, control 770 and believe that the last rebbe is moshiach and that nobody will proceed him. They aren't gonna accept anybody else. And plus, the non meshichist just say that since he could be moshiach, they will not choose another rebbe. The non meshichists are fine with or without a new rebbe anyways.

In short, it's because some still believe the last rebbe is moshiach.

  • 1
    Do you have any evidence to suggest this is the reason? – Daniel Aug 2 '16 at 4:10
  • My (orthodox, of course) friend told me this. And also, it's pretty obvious, the meshichist are waiting for the rebbe to come back and be the "new" rebbe – itai ifraim Aug 2 '16 at 4:13

In addition to many things that have been said here, there is a tradition amongst older chassidim in Russia that that there will be 7 rebbes and no rebbe before moshiach comes. I heard this directly from Eliyahu Touger(his name is all over chabad edition translations into english) who said it was a "known thing". I then promptly asked Uri Kaploun (also a known chabad editor) who said that a vintage Chosid R' Mottel Kozliner(he knew him personally) said this at a fabrengen in Nachlas Har Chabad years ago. In a sefer from R' Sholom Dovber Volpo, he brings that this ultimately came from the Rebbe Rashab himself.enter image description here

  • Can anyone document that this was ever said before 1993? – Double AA Feb 24 at 22:22
  • 1
    I certainly heard it, more or less ("7 rebbes and then moshiach!") from the Chabad rabbi in Berkeley, back in the '80s. – MichoelR Feb 24 at 23:15
  • 1
    @MichoelR ok but did you hear "there will be 7 rebbes and no rebbe before moshiach comes" – Double AA Feb 24 at 23:30
  • I see what you mean. Of course not. That whole line of thought didn't exist till the Rebbe died. – MichoelR Feb 25 at 0:00
  • “The whole line of thought didn’t exist..” That’s precisely what’s under discussion isn’t it. To say that is only to assume I’m wrong but I already told u I heard this from Eliyahu Touger, Uri Kaploun, and this is written in a book by R Volpo in the name of the alter chassidim. He said some said no rebbe and some have the tradition of no rebbe for a “short time”. They may have thought we could merit it not happen that way and didn’t want to have it in mind, but that doesn’t mean this wasn’t said. – Eliyahu770 Feb 25 at 3:03

You are all wrong. Rabbi Shaul Shimon Deutsch is the 8th Rebbe.

The Rebbe: The Life and Afterlife of Menachem Mendel Schneerson By Samuel Heilman, Menachem Friedman

  • 2
    How do you know this? – Alex Feb 27 '19 at 2:52
  • The Rebbe: The Life and Afterlife of Menachem Mendel Schneerson By Samuel Heilman, Menachem Friedman. I think Heilman mentions him here and there. He wears a kolpek – Kfir Feb 27 '19 at 3:51
  • 1
    If that book is your source you should edit it into the answer. Note that R. Deutsch's Wikipedia page claims that he is the Liozna Rebbe (which would seem to make him not the Lubvitcher Rebbe). – Alex Feb 27 '19 at 3:55
  • Well, 1000's of people followed him. I would think that would make it res ipso facto. – Kfir Feb 27 '19 at 4:01
  • 1
    Do the majority of Lubavitchers accept him as the Rebbe? – Alex Feb 27 '19 at 4:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .