The silk road from the Far East to Asia probably operated from about 200 B.C.E although it was not a direct trading route but worked in stages; so there was no direct contact from say China to Palestine. Marco Polo arrived in China around 1265 C.E. Chazal ascribe Noah's sons as founders of the Greeks etc. There is no reference to Chinese, Koreans or Japanese - so which son takes the honours?

  • mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0125.htm#6
    – Double AA
    Mar 10, 2013 at 20:50
  • 1
    David L, welcome to Mi Yodeya and thanks for the interesting question, which can, however, be improved by teasing out and separating within it the two separate subquestions its title refers to. (In the body of the question I really only see the second of those.) Also, please consider registering your account, which will give you access to more of the site's features.
    – msh210
    Mar 11, 2013 at 0:30
  • @DoubleAA Does your comment means that the "honours" of being the founders of the Chinese etc goes to the בְנֵי הַפִּילַגְשִׁים? Mar 12, 2013 at 15:01
  • @AvrohomYitzchok It says he sent them to ארץ קדם = the land of the east. I've heard that means China etc., but have no source.
    – Double AA
    Mar 15, 2013 at 15:43
  • Why does Marco polo never mention the great wall of china? Jul 24, 2020 at 17:24

4 Answers 4


Torah Meira - page 297 says that according to some Magog the son of Yefes is connected with Eretz Sin - ארץ סין. Although there are other translations of ארץ סין - one of the translations is China. This would indicate - at least according to this translation - that the Chinese are descendants of Yefes.

  • Are there people who apply different translations, or you are just listing possible translations from a modern dictionary?
    – Double AA
    Mar 15, 2013 at 15:42
  • Torah Meira himself indicates other possibilities. Mar 15, 2013 at 15:42
  • 4
    So... סין meaning China AFAIU comes from the Latin (whence Sino-), which came from the Sanskrit. This is a reference to the Qin dynasty. The Qin dynasty didn't exist until 200BC, long after Sinai, so it is doubtful that the Torah, written in the language of those who received it, would have mentioned a place completely unknown to its recipients. (Note: China in Chinese is written 中国 and is currently pronounced in Mandarin, "zhong guo"). Mar 15, 2013 at 16:19
  • 1
    @Charles Koppelman: The Torah says Magog is the son of Yefes. Sefer Torah Meira indicates that the Chinese are descendants of Magog the son of Yefes. Mar 15, 2013 at 16:26
  • 2
    Sorry, that should have been dong guo i.e 東 not 北. It has been awhile ;o) obviously. Mar 17, 2013 at 8:42

See all about the destinations of some of the 70 nations in Talmud Yerushalmi Megilla (Artscroll edition 12a,3). They quote R. Aharon Marcus in Kessess Hasofer who holds that the descendants of Magog (descendant of Yefes) may be identified with the Mongols, who lived near China (but who are known to have ranged as far as the Danube River). He notes that Arab writers have referred to the Great Wall of China as the "wall of Magog."

  • well that is more connected to the story of Dhul Qarnaiyn Jul 24, 2020 at 17:51

Well the Zohar Vayishlach 178a makes reference to the "Royal Tusser" which was also the Greek name for the Chinese domesticated silk worm(as opposed to the wild variety which is also mentioned in the Zohar). So it would appear that the Chinese were indeed known.

Considering that China is made up seven main people groups, it would really depend on which specific people group you are talking about. However, if we take the primary people group, the Han Chinese, who are believed to have emigrated north from India, then according to the Table given in the Jewish Encyclopedia based on the various midrashim, they would have been descended from Ham.

Now from a more Arheological perspective, I give you this:

Heth is the father of the Hittite nation. The Hittites were once regarded by archaeologists as a biblical blunder. Archaeologists said the Bible was absolutely wrong when it mentioned the Hittites, for there was no such people. But since that time, Hittite relics have been discovered in abundance, and scholars are now well aware of the great civilization that flourished under the Hittites. The Hebrew form of this word, Hittite, is Khettai and from this comes the word Cathay, which many of you will recognize as an ancient name for China. Certain of the Hittites migrated eastward and settled in China. Also, another name in this list, the Sinites, is linked with China. It derives from a presumed son of Canaan whose name was Sin. The Sinites migrated eastward until they came into Western China, where they founded the ancient Empire of China and gave their name to the land. There is a direct connection between the word China and the word Sinim, the biblical name for China. (I remember reading as a boy of the Sino-Japanese War, showing how the ancient name still persists.) They pushed eastward and toward the north over the land bridge into Alaska. The Sinites are the people who settled the Americas in prehistoric days and became the ancestors of the Eskimos and Indians who, to this very day, betray their Mongoloid ancestry.

By Stedman in his book The Beginnings.

So I'm going to go with Ham. Though there is also possibility that at least some of the people groups in China were descendents of Avraham Avinu's sons that he sent east(see Ibn Ezra Beresehit 26:1, and Genesis Rabba 65).

  • 1
    So you're saying the Hittites went all the way to Mongolia and Manchuria, picked up Proto-Mongolian and then went east to become the Khitan, after whom Cathay is named? Is there any evidence of this other than a lose connection of names that outsiders use for these groups? Mar 19, 2013 at 15:19
  • And more importantly, how does any of this show that Chazal knew about China? Mar 19, 2013 at 15:21
  • Also, the chart that you link to in the Jewish Encyclopedia says that Asians are from Ashkenaz ben Gomer ben Japheth. For India descending from Ham, it says, "Havilah: India (in Africa, south of Egypt)." Presumably that is not the India in Asia far west of Egypt. Mar 19, 2013 at 15:37
  • Technically, it's Asia (preconsuiaris), whatever that means... I assume it means an Asia that is different than the continent of Asia, but I have no idea. Mar 19, 2013 at 15:43
  • 1
    The parantheses incorporate other minor opinions found in the Midrash. In this case that would be South of Egypt. Also Preconsuiaris, was the Roman name for Rome's first African colony. Like I said you have several very distinct people groups living in China, and Midrashim that put the descendants of Ham, Yaphet, and Shem there. So it really becomes a toss up as to which one you are talking about. There is anecdotal evidence that Chazal new of the Chinese, such as the name of the domesticated silk worm, but aside from that, there isn't much of anything. Mar 19, 2013 at 16:55

Rabbi Philip Biberfeld in Universal Jewish History, writes:

The Sinites. A passage of the prophet Isaiah shows that they are obviously the Chinese. Their land is referred to as far away from Palestine, neither to the north nor to the west. It is highly significant in this connection that the Egyptian reliefs picture one type of Hittites with high cheek bones, oblique eyes, wearing pigtails like the people of Mongolia and China. Comparative archaeological investigations, moreover, have demonstrated with increasing clearness that nearly all basic elements of Chinese civilization have penetrated from the west. Some elements of their early art and industry appear to have come from Mesopotamia and Turkestan. The Biblical name Sin obviously is identical with that of the ancient Chinese province of Chin or Tsin, which conquered all the other provinces, established a unified empire, and gave to China the name by which it is known to nearly all the world except itself. (pg. 90-91)

Rabbi Biberfeld therefore identifies the Chinese as the Sinites, descendants of Cham through Canaan.

On the Mongols:

Magog was the forefather of the Mongols. The designations, 'Mandshu' and 'Mongol', are derived from their original name, 'Magog'. (pg. 84)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .