I recall learning, I think in mesechtas kiddushin, that a woman is the (halachic?) equivalent of a man who has had a bris milah performed. In other words, since she does not have the same organ she is viewed as if she is a person who has had a bris performed, not as a person who does not have a need to have one performed. What is the source for this idea?

  • 2
    Out of curiousity, what's the nafka mina? – yoel Feb 28 '13 at 22:24
  • LeMai Nafka Minah? – Seth J Feb 28 '13 at 22:25
  • for a dvar torah i'm working on, no halachic implication (that i'm aware of) – user2110 Feb 28 '13 at 22:28
  • 1
    @yoel, SethJ a practical application is mentioned in the g'mara (see my answer): this is the reason a woman can do a mila. – msh210 Mar 1 '13 at 0:35

Bavli, Avoda Zara 27:1:

אשה כמאן דמהילא דמיא
a woman is like someone circumcised

  • Spins on this come up in other contexts, e.g. suppose a non-Jewish man had his genitalia amputated, hence circumcision is an impossibility; can he convert to Judaism? – Shalom Mar 1 '13 at 2:33
  • @Shalom, this question probably covers that judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/33388/… – kqw Jul 20 '14 at 22:59

You must log in to answer this question.