7

I understand that prophecies in the Tanach seem to be very cryptic until the prophecy actually happens: then do the verses become clear and be correlated to the happened events. What are good examples of such a cryptic prophecy in Tanach?

3
  • See judaism.stackexchange.com/q/15215.
    – msh210
    Commented Feb 19, 2013 at 6:01
  • I don't think I would say that it is always the case that the prophecies are cryptic. Although they certainly are sometimes.
    – Daniel
    Commented Feb 19, 2013 at 6:22
  • 5
    I think that this misses an important point -- nevu'ah isn't always a predictive prophecy which has to be confirmed. It could be a warning of a consequence which can be averted, or a scolding over behavior already past.
    – rosends
    Commented Feb 19, 2013 at 14:05

2 Answers 2

6

Jonah's prophecy, "Nineveh will be overturned (נהפכת)," was originally ambiguous, even to Jonah himself; but once it came to pass, it became clear that it meant that their evil deeds were reversed to good deeds (see Sanhedrin 89b with Rashi).

1

Aish haTorah in their Discovery seminars uses the case of large and small letters written in the list of the sons of Haman, Megilas Esther 9:7-9

sons of Haman

There are 3 small letters: letter ת in  פַּרְשַׁנְדָּ֛תָא, letter ש in פַּרְמַ֙שְׁתָּא֙, and letter ז in וַיְזָֽתָא. There is also a large letter ו in וַיְזָֽתָא. The meaning of the message in these letters was not known. However, if one takes these to be year 707 = ת+ש+ז of the 6th Millenium, i.e. year 5707 which corresponds to 1946 when on Hoshanah Rabbah 10 Nazi war criminals were executed by hanging (just like the sons of Haman). One of the executed, Julius Streicher, an editor of Der Sturmer, screamed "Purimfest 1946!". Further details are in the article by Daniel Pinner. Obviously, after the fact it became clear.

The rule in the Megila is that any mention of the word king with quantifier Ahashveirosh refer to Ahashveirosh, but any mention of the word king without quantifier Ahashveirosh refer to G-d. The reason why the message is prophetic, can be seen by comparing words Esther 9:6-12, which note that Jews killed 500 men and 10 sons of Haman. These words are aknowledged by king (i.e. G-d) in Esther:9:12. After that in verses 13-14, Esther pleads with the king (i.e. G-d) again to execute another 10 sons of Haman (in the future), and He agrees! So why the need if the enemy was neutralized. Thus, it is a prophesy for the future.

4
  • 2
    I wouldn’t call this a prophecy.. At best it’s an interesting remez. I have no doubt that the large and small letters in the megillah have a deeper, more timeless meaning.
    – Yø-c Ro
    Commented Nov 26 at 19:45
  • @Yø-cRo thank you. I added an additional paragraph about it.
    – Y DJ
    Commented Nov 26 at 20:01
  • This is but one version of where to put the small letters. Other versions have other sets which don't allow for this conclusion.
    – Double AA
    Commented Nov 27 at 22:38
  • @Yø-cRo The Talmud (Megillah 16b) already tells us why the Vav in Vayzata is "stretched up" and it isn't this story. Hardly 'unknown'
    – Double AA
    Commented Nov 27 at 22:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .