Is there any halachic problem with singing or playing the song "haTikvah," considering that it was written by a secular Zionist and is the national anthem of the State of Israel?

  • 1
    The original text is more religious.
    – Shmuel
    Commented Jul 2, 2014 at 19:52
  • 2
    Non halochik but I heard the Lubavicher Rebbe did not like the words "FREE in our land" (hofshi bartzainu) that Jews are not free (from Torah and mitzvot) they need to surve Hashem
    – hazoriz
    Commented Jan 18, 2017 at 14:04
  • @hazoriz - That is referenced in the Wiki page, although the Lubavitcher Rebbe is not cited. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    – ezra
    Commented Jun 29, 2017 at 22:15
  • Original text found here (on Wikipedia cannot be found anymore): teachgreatjewishbooks.org/…
    – Binyomin
    Commented Oct 18, 2023 at 19:48

1 Answer 1


HaTikva is the Israeli national anthem. Certainly, how one views the State of Israel will have bearing on how one views its national anthem.

HaTikva was written by a secular Jew, and it speaks of a Jewish dream "to be a free people in our land", omitting any religious language.

Some religious Zionists will thus sing HaTikva with the modification from "am chofshi" to "am kodshi", a holy (instead of free) nation.

Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, Chief Rabbi of what is now Israel, proposed a different anthem with more religious overtones. Yet as it didn't really catch on, he was not opposed to singing HaTikva.

I suppose the reasons one would find it halachically problematic to sing HaTikva would therefore have to be one (or more) of the following beliefs:

  1. Any recognition of the State of Israel is halachically prohibited.
  2. By respecting a national anthem written from a secular viewpoint, one endorses secularism in an exclusive fashion. And the risk of such an endorsement outweighs any good accomplished by recognizing the anthem.
  3. Songs written by, popularized by, or endorsed by Jews who violated halacha are automatically prohibited by halacha.

The question of #1 is far beyond the scope of mi.yodeya.

As for #2, Rav Kook and his followers didn't think so; I'm not sure the question can be "answered" any better than that.

And regarding #3, R' Moshe Feinstein was asked about songs that became very popular in the Orthodox world that were composed by someone less-than-Orthodox. He writes that if the composer was just a sinner and not a heretic, it would be no problem. If the composer was a heretic, then his music would be prohibited from "religious use", but playing music at a wedding isn't "religious use." It would be proper, however, for a Torah scholar to avoid it.

I think all would agree that singing HaTikva is not done as "religious use", so therefore not completely prohibited. The only quesion remaining is whether it's "preferably avoided by Torah scholars", and how to weigh that preference against the value of recognizing the anthem. So see #2.

  • 4
    I don't think that #1 is beyond m.y's scope. You can certainly bring sources one way or the other. I wouldn't try to cover the topic exhaustively in this format, but I could certainly point to books that try to do that.
    – Isaac Moses
    Commented Jul 1, 2010 at 1:43
  • 1
    Can you source the statement from R. Moshe Feinstein? Is that in Igrot Moshe somewhere?
    – Chaim
    Commented Jan 18, 2017 at 4:01
  • @Chaim Perhaps it's Igros Moshe, Even HaEzer Vol. 1, § 96, referenced by \@Fred elsewhere. Also, see p. 53 in this PDF. torahleadership.org/categories/…
    – WAF
    Commented Jan 18, 2017 at 13:32

You must log in to answer this question.