Should one recite Birkath HaMazon after eating foods that one did not realize were prohibited, or does this fall under the idea that doing so is offensive?
6
-
Citing not bentching after purposely eating them would add context to your question and better it.– msh210 ♦Jul 5, 2012 at 22:09
-
No doubt. See my comment on the other question I just posted of a similar nature.– Seth JJul 5, 2012 at 22:13
-
Huh? Why would it be offensive?– Adam MoshehJul 5, 2012 at 22:42
-
@AdamMosheh Tehillim 10:3– Double AA ♦Jul 5, 2012 at 23:57
-
related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/14905/759– Double AA ♦Jul 6, 2012 at 0:28
|
Show 1 more comment
1 Answer
The Taz (OC 196 sk 1) rules that one who ate something prohibited (even Biblically) by accident is allowed to say an after bracha, as it is no worse than one who eats prohibited foods when forced to because of pikuach nefesh which the Shulchan Aruch already rules (OC 196:2) do get blessings.
The Mishna Berurah (sk 4) quotes this Taz approvingly, but the Aruch HaShulchan (:4) questions him and seems to disagree. CYLOR!
answered Jul 6, 2012 at 0:51
-
I think that there is a machloket between RAhA and someone else in Brachot but I have no books to verify– koutyJul 27, 2016 at 3:56