Suppose the one who is leining (reading) the Megillah needs to stop in the middle of leining, and is unable to continue. Is someone who was there the entire time allowed to take over?

  • 1
    Just a reminder if you're planning on doing this on purpose, don't break at the gentile "chapter" marks in a synagogue. Find meaningful Jewish points for the synagogue service.
    – Double AA
    Commented Jan 26, 2020 at 18:56

3 Answers 3


Nitei Gavriel (38:9) says that it's fine, provided that (as in your example) the second person heard the berachos and the reading up to that point.

Although in 45:2 he cites differing opinions about the case where the baal korei was unable to continue reading and someone else takes over, whether that second person should start over from the beginning (which, he says - citing Shaarei Teshuvah, Orach Chaim 692:1 - is preferable if it's not too burdensome for the listeners, or if they agree to his doing so). I'm not clear on the reason for the difference: Magen Avraham there (the source for the stricter position) analogizes it to a case (284:5) where someone else had to take over the haftarah reading, where he has to start over so that the entire portion is bracketed by proper berachos, but then the same would seem to apply whether the takeover was planned or not.


The IDF handbook for Purim (available here) in question 30 footnote 62 on page 61 quotes Rav Chaim Kanievsky and Rav Mordechai Eliyahu as approving of the arranging for multiple Ba'alei Keriya even from the outset.

  • 2
    Olat Yitzchak 3 185 says no lechatchila because of iggeret
    – Double AA
    Commented Jun 26, 2017 at 16:54
  • Note that Lechatchila there seems to be if it would be hard for just one person to lein the whole thing, so I don't know if that can be extended to Lechatchila Mamash when there is someone who can easily lein the whole thing... Commented Jan 24, 2018 at 23:50
  • yeshiva.org.il/ask/111716
    – Double AA
    Commented Feb 14 at 20:03

The Young Israel of St. Louis (Missouri) does this l'chat'chila every year, and has done so both under its current rabbi, Rabbi Moshe Shulman, and IIRC under its previous, Rabbi Jeffrey Bienenfeld, so I assume that at the very least yesh al mi lismoch (there's an authority to rely on for the practice). Moreover, I cannot think of a reason to forbid it (not that that means much).

  • 1
    We did this in college as well, with no objection from the minyan's Rabbi. One possible distinction is that in YI's case and ours, the replacement reader had in mind during the blessing that he'd be taking over. However, given that everyone present including the reader intended to fulfill the same mitzva at the time of the blessing, I suspect that this distinction wouldn't invalidate the case at hand.
    – Isaac Moses
    Commented Mar 5, 2012 at 20:56
  • Why would they do this?
    – yydl
    Commented Mar 6, 2012 at 3:06
  • yydl, I can think of several reasons. I don't know whether any of them is the case, or which. (1) Each baal k'ria read at a separate minyan and the two combined, so now both read so as to slight neither. (2) For fun, just to do something a little different on Purim. (3) Neither baal k'ria has a good deal of breath. (Or one doesn't but is the established baal k'ria so shouldn't be removed.)
    – msh210
    Commented Mar 6, 2012 at 3:15
  • 1
    @yydl, In college, we did this so that many community members would have the opportunity to learn to read the Megilla without the pressure of having to learn to read the whole thing, and also because we didn't always have someone available who either had already practiced the whole Megilla or had the time and wherewithal to learn it all now.
    – Isaac Moses
    Commented Mar 6, 2012 at 17:19
  • 1
    I'd love to see a different reader for the different voices :)
    – avi
    Commented Mar 11, 2012 at 14:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .