8

Why was Rachel holding onto Lavan's idols for a few days? Since she was trying to prevent Lavan from doing Avodah Zara she should have thrown them out immediately!

5
  • 2
    Related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/110275/27180
    – Shmuel
    Nov 26, 2023 at 15:06
  • Very interesting discussion but I'm not sure it answers the reason why she kept them in the first place...
    – Sam Kramer
    Nov 26, 2023 at 15:24
  • 1
    True, that's why I said that this question is somewhat related.
    – Shmuel
    Nov 26, 2023 at 15:28
  • Oh missed that. Shkoyach!
    – Sam Kramer
    Nov 26, 2023 at 15:42
  • I haven't seen this suggested anywhere, but my own speculation is as follows: Rachel clearly felt it to be judicious to conceal the act from Yaaqobh as well. Both the homes of Labhan and Yaaqobh had servants, handmaids, etc. about from whom she also then had to conceal them. She may not have had much time to her herself and really much privacy at all. Accordingly, she hid them beneath her menstrual cushion, knowing that eventually when arising from it she would be afforded the privacy she needed to attend to her needs and would at such time dispose of them. Nov 26, 2023 at 19:00

1 Answer 1

3

In this related answer, I showed that the answer to your question is rather controversial in the commentaries, and no answer is totally clear. One of the thrusts in the commentaries (Rashi, Rav Hirsch etc.) is that she stole them to wean her father off idolatry, by demonstrating that they were powerless.

The most direct answer to your question would be along these lines, and in the words of Rabbeinu Channanel (brought by Rabbeinu Bachaye):

ותגנב רחל את התרפים אשר לאביה; she stole them in order that he would reconsider his actions, saying to himself that any deity which allows itself to be stolen surely cannot be much good to anyone. The same argument had been used by Yoash who said if baal was really capable of avenging himself, he should do so himself instead of letting his human worshippers become his defender (Judges 6,31). Similar arguments are reflected in Ezekiel 28,9 where the prophet predicts the downfall of the King of Tzor (Tyre) who had declared himself a god. He ridicules this “god” as saying to his murderer: “I am a god!” (quoted by Rabbeinu Bachya).

It seems that he is saying that if they were destroyed, then fine - there are ways of accomplishing that would have made sense to Lavan. But them being stolen is something that would make him realise that they are powerless.

1
  • 2
    Thank you for the response!
    – Sam Kramer
    Nov 26, 2023 at 18:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .