0

According to the Wikipedia page on this topic, since the reign of Abikarib Asʿad (c. 384-433 CE), Judaism was adopted as the de facto state religion of the Himyarite Kingdom. It seems that Judaism may have been adopted to some extent as much as two centuries earlier, but inscriptions to polytheistic deities ceased after this date. It was embraced initially by the upper classes, and possibly a large proportion of the general population over time. Virtually all scholars are in agreement about this except one, who still acknowledges that it definitely makes sense for it to be this way though and even he acknowledges that by the time of Dhu Nuwas's reign (c. 517 - 527 CE) there is basically zero disagreement among the scholars that the king was Jewish, there was presence of Jewish tribal influence and other Jewish influence among the elites as well as the population most likely, the ruling elites and nobles were Jewish, etc.

Taking into account that a Jewish state existed after the exile, how does this impact Jewish beliefs in the sense of, does it deter or delay the arrival of the Messiah? Did they break the Jewish law regarding Jews not being allowed to have a state until the arrival of the Messiah? Does this state existing in the past have any impact on the future of Jews or does it change the laws?

I'm not sure if I phrased this well, but please let me know if I need to clarify since AFAIK Jews aren't allowed to have a state until the arrival of the Messiah, but a Jewish state has apparently existed long before even the contemporary "State of Israel". So how does this work Halachically and what happens now?

12
  • 1
    Why aren't Jews allowed to have a state before the time of Messiah? cf. The Bar Kokhba autonomy, purportedly medieval Kuzar and of course the State of Israel.
    – Harel13
    Apr 22, 2023 at 20:36
  • Hm, perhaps I was wrong. I think that the B.Talmud, Tractate Kesubos, 111a is rather about forceful recapture of the Land of Israel, but not about establishing a Jewish state somewhere else per se. Also the theme of collecting all the Jews to the Land of Israel, etc. is different from establishing a Jewish state somewhere else. I do remember hearing some Rabbis still saying that one cannot even have any Jewish state though, but unfortunately I can't remember who it was. Thanks for bringing my attention to this, I'm new to Jewish beliefs and always looking to learn more.
    – setszu
    Apr 22, 2023 at 21:04
  • The problem is having a state in Israel proper. There is no problem with a different kingdom being Jewish, as long as they don't claim to be the state of the Messiah.
    – N.T.
    Apr 23, 2023 at 4:47
  • @Harel13 The state of Israel is very controversial. A large part of the Chassidic and more right-wing Litvish world were against it for those reasons.
    – N.T.
    Apr 23, 2023 at 4:48
  • 1
    The split occurred when the "Charedi" Jews realized that the "secular" Jews were not interested in the state having a religious Torah-based public sphere. The 3 Vows was a later attempt at rationalizing the move. As I said, this is not the place for a proper debate, so I won't say anything further for now.
    – Harel13
    Apr 23, 2023 at 6:09

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .