2

One description of a Tanya Tzadik says (from this answer):

This provides us with new parameters for understanding who is a Tzadik. In a Tzadik, the battle between the two souls is over and the winner is the Godly soul. It subdued the animal soul, took it prisoner and gave it a completely new identity. Not only has it stopped opposing the Godly soul, it actually changed sides. As a result the Tzadik never sins, does only good deeds and mitzvot and has absolutely no desire or interest in anything outside the realm of holiness, mitzvot, and goodness - not in his actions, words, or even a single thought."

But if so, why does a Tanya level Tzadik get rewarded? If he has absolutely no desire to sin and only desires to do mitzvot, it should then take him near zero effort to be Torah observant at the highest levels (in fact, it would bring him pleasure). But isn't reward and punishment in Judaism based on the level of effort?

12
  • Not my bailiwick, but the Meshech Chochma (Intro to Shemos) says that Hashem took away Moshe Rabbeinu's bechira, so that Israel could be יאמינו לעולם, believe in him without any need for doubt. I don't see why that would mean that he cannot get reward; he was the one who brought himself to the level where that could happen, and gets rewarded for all the good that results, even in the future.
    – MichoelR
    Dec 22, 2022 at 14:26
  • You should know Tanya itself deals with this question. I recommend finding a good shiur and learning it properly as all is covered. Bli neder, I've got a back log of things on this site I need to get back to but I'll try to bring the answer if nobody beats me to it - it's indeed a great question, thanks for asking
    – Rabbi Kaii
    Dec 22, 2022 at 14:49
  • @RabbiKaii Can you please point out the location you have in mind where Tanya answers this question?
    – user9806
    Dec 22, 2022 at 20:40
  • 1
    @MichoelR certainly, your bringing those has been really exciting and useful thank you, never meant to imply otherwise
    – Rabbi Kaii
    Jan 2 at 9:57
  • 1
    This is the subject of the first section of Derech HaShem by the Ramchal. The struggle of the individual is only one aspect of “the Service of Teshuva”. It is also the meaning of of the Zohar and the coming of Moshiach like the Alter Rebbe explains in Likkutei Torah to Shir HaShirim 41:29. Jan 13 at 15:08

2 Answers 2

1

In this answer, I want to try to walk back the normative ideas we have about reward and punishment. Using Tanya as our source, we see that Tanya has come along to actually inform us that this system of reward and punishment is not the whole story. Just like everything in Torah, as we get older, we gradually but surely get deeper and closer to the more mature truth behind the sugya, and this is no different. The Lubavitcher Rebbe said that learning Chassidus is like being born again - even the impressions you got when you were a baby need to be "rewritten". Let's see if we can do this here.

The common conception of reward and punishment is that Hashem, being perfect and in need of nothing, decided in His goodness, to do us a favour and give us a chance to earn some reward (see Derech Hashem part 1). To establish this, He created good and evil, gave us a yeiter towards each, and rewards us whenever we overcome our yeitzer hara, and whenever we utilise our yeitzer hatov, and we get punished whenever we do the opposite, chas veshalom.

This idea is the very basic, immature version of a much deeper idea. If we neglect to graduate beyond it, we run the risk of losing people. In fact, many Jews who go off the derech, or who refuse to get on the derech in the first place, cite this idea as their main turn off. So basically stated, it sounds horrific to many people. We are created against our will, kicked out of paradise down to a rough world, and told to return by earning reward, and if we don't, we will be punished. During that time we have to encounter terrible suffering, and the odds are stacked against us. Hashem didn't even need to do this, so it seems all this is arbitrary, including all the terrible suffering. We need to go deeper!

So Tanya let's out the secret. The real, deeper reason that Hashem created the world is in order to establish a "dira betachton". Our goal is not to get back to heaven! Our goal is to bring Hashem down here, and make this world a comfortable, Godly place for Hashem (and each other and our own Godly neshamas). In fact, it goes even deeper than that. Hashem isn't into "places", He's not looking for a good mountain-top villa made out of beautiful sandstone with blue wave patterns. Hashem wants to dwell with us. A dira is a home, and a home is not a home unless you share it with your beloved, and Hashem's beloved is Yisrael. Bishvil Yisrael nivra olam (second Rashi on Bereshit).

So it's not about reward and punishment. It's not all about us. At least, not in that sense! It's all about us to Him, but from our point of view, it's all about Him (and each other). The worst thing that ever happened to Judaism was when we somehow absorbed this idea that everything is just a game to get into heaven and avoid hell, to gain reward and avoid punishment.

So the Tanya fills in more information to complete the picture. Firstly, Hashem gave us a very specific job to make this world comfortable for Him and our neshamas, and that is fixing the etz hada'at. Of course, He could have done that Himself, but He has confidence in us that we can do it and therefore really become His partners. Fixing the etz hada'at means we have to take every last detail of life and the human condition, and find a way to make it holy and have a proper place in a holy life.

Hashem's Tzibur is made up of Tzaddikim, Benonim and Rashaim (TziBuR). The Benonim and the Rashaim are the general population and the way they perform this mission is by having a yeitzer hara that makes evil pleasurable and appealing, and their job is to overcome this, either through avoidance and middot improvement, or teshuva (or both). Due to the lowly state a neshama has to be in for this to even be possible, these two groups are not capable of achieving very great heights of holiness and tzidkut, which takes tremendous sensitivity and distance from sin. As a result Hashem also created some special individuals who do not have a yeitzer hara and are not part of this. Their job is to be the shepherds of the rest of the tzibur. They spend their time learning, teaching, leading, and ensuring that the work the beinonim and rashaim is completed. Through prayer and tikkunim that they only know, they actually affect the elevations that the beinonim and rashaim begin when they do their work, and bring down the Godliness into the world in the place prepared for it by the beinonim and rashaim. They invite Hashem down into His world.

So the picture we have of reward and punishment is out the window now. This is not a game. This is Hashem's genuine attempt at making a real life of yichud with Yisrael, and He has put that in our hands. The real "reward and punishment" of this system is not necessarily about good and evil. That's just a special case, whereby some people are deliberately given a real connection to evil so that they can go and affect a tikkun, and work on it.

So the Tanya has listed out 3 different jobs we've been given, two of which involve connection to evil, one not. The schar, the wage, is in proportion to the effort put it. For beinonim and rashaim, the effort comes from overcoming evil, but for the tzaddikim, they have to put in effort in other ways. Both of these are equally precious to Hashem.

Perhaps the best way to illustrate this is by looking at human relationships. Starting with a father and his children, it's very clear that if one of the children really enjoys doing his father's will, the father gains tremendous pleasure from this child. The children who have to struggle gain a particular endearment to the father, as they struggle, even if this struggle means their accomplishments are much more meagre, objectively speaking.

As you wrote in your comment below, this good child gains pleasure from performing the will of the father, but I disagree that that means it is not an effort. The good child shows his devotion to his father by really dedicating himself to his father's will, and working very hard. The father would never say "this amazing house you built for me over 20 years of blood sweat and tears is meaningless to me because you enjoyed building it"! In fact, I'd go further and say that the fact that the son enjoyed doing it for his father adds to the fathers pleasure. Judaism does not say that pleasure is somehow a detraction from altruism!! A very important point! Altruism is the measure of where do you get your pleasure from, is it from your own desires, or from fulfilling the desires of others? The latter is not natural and is remarkable if it is achieved by anyone. The latter is the very definition of a Godly relationship of "I am for my beloved and my beloved is for me", which can be summarised as both parties in the relationship saying "I get no pleasure from serving myself, only from serving you". The converse is also true, "I get no pleasure from serving myself, but it does please me when you do things for me, because it's you". We all know that when we cook ourselves a meal, it's no where near as delicious as when a special someone else cooks us a meal, even if it's actually identical.

So to summarise. The Tanya completes a picture for us that makes the question fall away. Creation and life is not an arbitrary "game" for us to earn reward and avoid punishment. We are all going to Olam Haba, it's not about that. Life is a chance to build a close relationship with Hashem and each-other, and create a life for us, and create a home for us. The reward is the closeness, the goodness of a Godly relationship and home. Even deeper: the reward is each other, the reward is Hashem, may He be blessed! The punishment is the shame and sadness that comes from pushing this plan backwards instead of forwards. The reward is the pleasure we gain from serving others and seeing how it really does make a genuine difference to them (Avot 1:3), the punishment is seeing how we failed others, how we hurt them or worse... Hashem included. This goes beyond simplistic good and evil, and tzaddikim are key players in realising this plan. It is also notable that this is our only chance to achieve this. In Olam Haba it won't be possible...

As Ramchal says in Chapter 13 of Mesilat Yisharim, a chassid is someone who is motivated to serve out of love. They are not simply hoping to tick the boxes of yes-good, no-bad, but they sincerely wish to anticipate the desires of their master, and please them.

As the Lubavitcher Rebbe put it, when we accepted Torah, we did so b'mesirat nefesh. Included in that is our pleasure. So rewarding us by giving us pleasure in Olam Haba isn't going to work! The only thing that will work is schar mitzva mitzva: seeing how much it meant to Hashem is going to be the only reward we will accept, and the reward is great....

7
  • Thank you for this answer. Whether a tzadik desires to be rewarded or not, I think it's pretty well accepted that tzadikim do in fact get (greatly) rewarded. So the question remains - if "l'fum tzara agra" holds (for anyone, tzadik or not), if reward is proportional to effort, then the great reward of tzadikim implies they exerted great effort. But like stated in the original question, it takes the tzadik near zero effort since it actually brings him pleasure to do G-d's will.
    – user9806
    Jan 13 at 18:42
  • [As a sort of analogy, if you put a delicious meal in front of someone who starved for days, their act of eating it would be zero (or 'negative' in fact) effort]. So perhaps l'fum tzara agra just simply doesn't apply to tzadikim - they're rewarded without putting in effort. But then we have a class of people who have to work hard to get rewarded, and another who just get rewarded without effort, which seems problematic as well.
    – user9806
    Jan 13 at 18:42
  • @user9806 I think I failed to explain myself properly given your response, so I've completely rewritten the answer. I've addressed all your points now, so may I ask if it's not too much that you read the entire answer I have given (apologies for it being so long)
    – Rabbi Kaii
    Jan 16 at 15:25
  • Thank you for your beautiful exposition of the "dira betachtonim" concept. I still think my original question isn't really answered by this though. Condensed to an almost symbolic form, it's: Given a) Reward is always proportional to effort b) Tzadik exerts no effort because he actually gets pleasure c) Tzadik still gets greatly rewarded - then a,b,c can't all be consistent at once. The question is which statement is incorrect. In the part of your answer relevant to this, you seem to be saying it's b - that a tzadik still somehow exerts effort (as you put it through "blood sweat and tears").
    – user9806
    Jan 18 at 0:58
  • So that's something that would be good to further explain. If someone truly gets only pleasure from doing an action (e.g. the physical act of eating an ice cream on a hot Summer day), it just can't be said to require any effort (and certainly not blood sweat and tears). Or are you saying that a tzadik still puts in a lot of effort even though he gets pleasure from the results of that effort (and from his belief in the mission, etc.)? That'd be an acceptable explanation (and similar to the 2nd part of Aayal Taarog's answer).
    – user9806
    Jan 18 at 1:00
0

It's a very good question! Indeed, as I first began typing in one answer, I slowly started realizing more and more that it's actually a much better question than I initially thought. However, I have two possible answers for you.

  1. Maybe, once one reaches that point, he has already earned the highest level of reward available! However, there is no reason to be bothered that "If so, why he is still alive and required to continue to fulfill God's commandments if he already achieved perfection and completed his mission?". That is not a difficulty because a) He enjoys doing God's will so why not let him continue?... And b) God may still want him alive as a tool to use for carrying out various tasks in the world. In truth, I would take this answer further and flip it on you to ask the opposite of what you asked. "If one has completely triumphed over his evil inclination to the point where evil holds absolutely no power over him whatsoever, then he should already have earned the ultimate level of reward! It shouldn't be possible to offer him more reward because he already earned everything to the highest max! Therefore, what would be the point of continued fulfillment of God's commandments? It's not getting him anything more than he already has so it's superfluous!". I believe this is the opposite of your question of "Why should he continue to receive reward if nothing is a challenge for him anymore and therefore nothing is earned?".

  2. Maybe what you quote is only referring to the evil inclination's active desire for things other than holiness. However, there is another roadblock to Perfection besides for the Evil Inclination, this roadblock is what I will call "Dis-ire" (Similar to "Dislike). Not dEsire (positive will for something), but dIsire (the complete opposite of active will/the desire to not experience something negative, i.e., pain.) What I am proposing is that the fact that a person "Disire's" pain, even in a case where withstanding that pain is necessary to fulfill a Mitzvah, does not stem from the Evil Inclination. It DOES stem from evil to actively desire bad pleasures, but one's disire to withstand pain even when it's necessary for the sake of the Greater Good, is not a challenge between good and evil, but rather between what I would call "the choice to rise above oneself for the sake of the Greater Good vs Failing to rise above oneself (In this scenario the "self" is also holy, just not as holy as what is termed "the Greater Good". That is why the correct thing to do is to sacrifice oneself for the sake of God's Will. That's the perfect word actually! "SACRIFICE"! In short, I would summarize with two sorts of free will in regard to God's will. 1) The fight between Good and Evil. This is a fight that a person can win at, and completely eradicate his enemy/evil. 2) The fight between oneself and sacrificing of oneself. Neither of these can be considered evil options. According to this theory, even when one conquers their evil inclination, they still are susceptible to failing to fulfill God's word in cases where it is painful for them to do so. This is because even though they no longer desire evil, they still don't want pain or hardship! Therefore, there can often be situations in which even the most Righteous Man is required to choose to overcome some level of hardship or pain in order to fulfill God's will.

4
  • 1
    Do you have sources or are these your personal opinions?
    – mbloch
    Dec 22, 2022 at 6:26
  • I'm not hiding the fact that this is all simply speculation of mine. As far as I can see the OP never asked for answers to be limited to strictly sourced material. On the contrary, it seems they are asking for any help in possible paths to understanding the topic, so I offered my two cents. Of course, please feel more than free to supply any supporting or opposing sources that you are aware of. And that applies for everybody! Dec 22, 2022 at 6:37
  • 3
    Please check out our code of conduct. This site might be working differently than other StackExchange sites. On Mi Yodeya, it is recommended that an answer needs to be (in the best scenario) backed up by any sources.
    – Shmuel
    Dec 22, 2022 at 11:01
  • Those are interesting perspectives, thank you
    – user9806
    Dec 22, 2022 at 20:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .