The Rambam in the beginning of the laws of kings chapter 11 brings the proofs from the Torah for how we know Moshiach.
The first proof is a verse from the Torah saying Hashem will "return us" to the land.
The second, in that same halacha (#1) is the passage of the prophet Bilaam, and the Rambam explains which verses in that passage refer to Moshiach.
Then the Rambam finishes the first halacha, starts the second, and brings a third proof from the cities of refuge.
The question is, if the first halacha is, seemingly, to bring the different proofs from the Torah regarding Moshiach, then why does he mention the cities of refuge in it's own halacha, and not together with the other two?
Or if he wants to list each proof in a separate halacha, then why not list the proof from the passage of Bilaam in the second halacha, and the cities of refuge in the third?