Can a sikrikon be Jewish, or are they by definition non-Jewish bandits?
If by definition non-Jewish, then why are they specifically listed as not bringing bikkurim in the Mishna? (Bikkurim 1:2) Non-Jews don't bring bikkurim anyway, right?
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
A non-Jew is of course not shayach to the mitzva of bikkurim, so the sikrikon mentioned in the mishna must surely be a Jewish one, or a non-Jew who subsequently sold the land to a Jew (the point being that the holder of the land, be it a Jewish sikrikon or a Jewish person having 'bought' the land from a sikrikon, doesn't halachically own the land and therefore can't bring bikkurim).
[edited to include the case of a non-Jewish sikrikon who sold the land to a Jew].
Explains the Bartenura (on the Mishna you cited):
הורג נפשות ונותן לו קרקע כדי שלא יהרגנו. ולשון סקריקון שא קרקע והניחני
A sikrikon is someone who murders people and to whom people give land to avoid being murdered, and the source of the word is "sa karka vehanicheni" (roughly "take the land and leave me alone").
And the mishna mentioned a sikrikon separate from a gazlan because the cases are different. While by a gazlan who robs someone's field, there's no hava amina that the land would in some way be his (since surely the rightful owner will not have given over his rights to the gazlan), by the sikrikon we could have thought that since the field's original owner did in some way give over the land - nevertheless, like the Bartenura goes on and explains (ibid):
ואע״ג דיהיב ליה לפי שעה לא מחיל ליה דסבר האידנא לשקול ולמחר תבענא ליה בדינא
And even though he (the landowner) gives it to him (the sikrikon) for now, he doesn't relinquish his ownership since he thinks that while today he (the sikrikon) takes the field, tomorrow I'll sue him in beis din.