10

Do the flames atop the chanukiya need to be a certain size to be valid? At the extreme, are tiny (but sustained) balls of blue flame sufficient?

5
  • 1
    I would be so surprised if the answerer actually gives a source. This is a good question, but I don't see it being mentioned in any Sefarim. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. Dec 22, 2011 at 4:11
  • 2
    I bet it's just about how much/what type of pirsumei nissa you are going for. At a window, a little ball is pointless, but on your table it could be fine.
    – Double AA
    Dec 22, 2011 at 4:24
  • @double aa I would go as far to say that based on what you said this is probably a Miswa Min HaMuvhar but not MeIkar HaDin. Dec 22, 2011 at 4:33
  • AFAIK, as long as you can see the flames it's ok...
    – Shmuel
    Dec 22, 2011 at 6:02
  • @ShmuelL and as long as you are not putting your house at danger of fire breaking out because of the too big fire.
    – user1117
    Dec 26, 2011 at 9:06

1 Answer 1

8

A fire is a fire is a fire - See OH 673(1)

ואע"פ שאין השמנים נמשכים אחר הפתילה ואין האור נתלה יפה באותם הפתילות

Even though the wicks don't absorb the oil well and the light [fire] doesn't attach well to those wicks (--translation mine)

(i.e. even if your lights are poor, your still yotzeh the mitzvah).

That being said, the מצוה מן המבחר is to use materials that will give off a light that is "pure and clean" (Rama, ibid.). The Mishna Berura also something along the lines of what @doubleaa said: The goal here is Persumei Nisa. Hence, if people can't see them, you may have an issue at hand.

1
  • Mbrevda, welcome to Judaism.SE, and thanks very much for this source and insight! I look forward to seeing you around.
    – Isaac Moses
    Dec 29, 2011 at 12:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .