10

Were there copies of any of the Books of Maccabees (and/or Megillas Antiochus) found amongst in the Dead Sea Scrolls?

Improve this question

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
6

According to Vermes, every book of the Tanach was represented by fragments except Esther, probably because it involved a Jewish woman intermarrying with a gentile king. The reason the already-written Maccabees book would definitely NOT be found there is that the Dead Sea sect was absolutely opposed to the Maccabean/Hasmonean High priests. The background of the "Damascus" document and a bunch of their other writings makes it appear that the sect split off from the "mainstream" Jews precisely because non-Zadok decended High Priests were serving in the Temple. After Onias the High priest was murdered, first the Seleucid Kings in charge installed some, and then the Maccabees themselves — non Zadokites — took over the High priesthood. The Dead Sea guys withdrew to Qumron, probably to maintain purity for themselves and their leaders, who were apparently Zadokite priests. The Book(s) of Maccabees would have been absolutely anathema to them, and they would neither have copied nor kept copies of it.

Improve this answer
2
  • 4
    Speculating about Esther's absence is inherently weak, because Chronicles, which is a pretty large book, is barely represented at all. It might just be a coincidence.
    – Double AA ♦
    Commented Oct 17, 2013 at 21:49
  • Note, however, the Prayer for the Well-being of King Yonatan found in Qumran. Yonatan is believed to be the Hasmonean Alexander Yannai.
    – Harel13
    Commented Nov 14 at 5:44
5

According to Wikipedia, no.

Improve this answer
2

There are several books called "Maccabbees," and they're pretty much unrelated to each other. They also written across a wide time span. Only the first book (IIRC) would have been composed in time for the Dead Sea Sect to have it in it's collection. But since they were an isolationist sect who weren't too pleased with the monarchy and the priests, it makes sense that they would not have preserved a book which glorifies both.

Improve this answer
2
  • (Not the best answer, I know. I'll add supporting sources later.)
    – Shmuel
    Commented Dec 20, 2011 at 23:22
  • Your last sentence certainly makes sense, but AFAIK the next three "books of Maccabees" were also written early enough that the Dead Sea folks could have known about them. (And you'd think that the third and fourth ones, at least - which really have little or nothing to do with the Chashmonaim and the story of Chanukah - might have appealed to them.)
    – Alex
    Commented Dec 21, 2011 at 1:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .